Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results


Gaming 93% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 90% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 94% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	100% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	90.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 (all builds)
Memory	14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit farger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170915
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 06 '17 at 19:19
Run Duration	155 Seconds
Run User	NOR-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	88.6% Excellent	Memory 88 1-Core 120 2-Core 240 84% 149 Pts	4-Core 479 8-Core 955 85% 717 Pts	64-Core 1,332 82% 1,332 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 88.6% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400 91,676 User benchmarks, average bench 87% AMD(1002 6B76) CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.11.4 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	Lighting 125 Reflection 94.4 Parallax 189 102% 136 fps	MRender 90.9 Gravity 125 Splatting 132 97% 116 fps
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 94%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 1TB-$130 21,936 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 682GB free Firmware: M0CR060 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1949 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 296 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 4 (AE) Unknown 100 100 119 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 63 48 223339544613 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 3195266310 (F7) Unknown 100 100 100130617 (F8) Unknown 100 100 11843558 (B4) Unknown 0 0 4400 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0	79.4% Very good	Read 486 Write 339 Mixed 337 86% 387 MB/s	4K Read 26.3 4K Write 63.8 4K Mixed 26.1 107% 38.7 MB/s	DQ Read 138 DQ Write 165 DQ Mixed 14.1 49% 106 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 79.4% Great: 105%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 299GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 9 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 3 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 59 56 41 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 99 99 345162530	90.4% Outstanding	Read 521 Write 414 Mixed 422 101% 452 MB/s	4K Read 42.2 4K Write 84.9 4K Mixed 25.3 141% 50.8 MB/s	DQ Read 41.7 DQ Write 82.9 DQ Mixed 23.9 29% 49.5 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 90.4% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 162GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 601 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 68 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 57 39 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 10 (F1) Unknown 99 99 287144319	91.4% Outstanding	Read 517 Write 419 Mixed 424 101% 454 MB/s	4K Read 44.2 4K Write 83.9 4K Mixed 25.4 144% 51.1 MB/s	DQ Read 43.9 DQ Write 87 DQ Mixed 25.6 31% 52.2 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 91.4% Great: 124%
ASMT ASM1352R-PM 8TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 5TB free, PID a006 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	103% Outstanding	Read 221 Write 235 Mixed 219 292% 225 MB/s	4K Read 29.5 4K Write 4.05 4K Mixed 0.43 262% 11.3 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB-$73 54,616 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	117% Outstanding	MC Read 46.6 MC Write 44.9 MC Mixed 40 125% 43.8 GB/s	SC Read 26.5 SC Write 34.8 SC Mixed 28.7 86% 30 GB/s	Latency 69.6 58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 129%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	96x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	69x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	67x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	57x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	28x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	20x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	17x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $871

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)