| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 25.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
CPU throttled at 5% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
| Motherboard | Asrock H97M Pro4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20150727 |
| Uptime | 4.1 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 09 '17 at 15:21 |
| Run Duration | 93 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
| CPU Throttled | 5% |
PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
39.7%
Below average
|
32% 44.8 Pts
|
12% 92.5 Pts
|
6% 92.9 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 990 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.4.4
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.7%
Poor
|
21% 38.4 fps
|
35% 43 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
93%
Outstanding
|
118% 157 MB/s
|
121% 1.27 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL Ares DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
42.1%
Average
|
47% 16.3 GB/s
|
17% 6.03 GB/s
|
34% 116 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H97M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,131 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H97M Pro4 - $200
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 178x |
| Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples | 155x |
| Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 153x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 109x |
| HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 77x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 65x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $674 |