| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 3.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
| System | Dell Precision M6400 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Dell |
| Memory | 4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20110925 |
| Uptime | 4.2 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 05 '16 at 23:19 |
| Run Duration | 111 Seconds |
| Run User | CZE-User |
| Background CPU | 24% |
PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
42.2%
Average
|
40% 57.9 Pts
|
9% 64.8 Pts
|
4% 70.5 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro FX 2700M
Dell(1028 019B) 512MB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.16.11.8992
|
3.2%
Terrible
|
3% 3.66 fps
|
4% 4.66 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD WD2500BJKT-75F4T0 250GB
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
26.1%
Poor
|
31% 41.6 MB/s
|
69% 0.62 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
18.7%
Very poor
|
16% 5.73 GB/s
|
15% 5.27 GB/s
|
43% 93.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Precision M6400 Builds (Compare 61 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Dell Precision M6400
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Extreme Q9300Intel $172Bench 46%, 660 samples | 14x |
| Core2 Duo T9600Intel $170Bench 39%, 2,726 samples | 11x |
| Core2 Duo T9550Intel $199Bench 39%, 1,427 samples | 8x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro FX 2700MNvidiaBench 3%, 788 samples | 30x |
| Quadro FX 3700MNvidiaBench 6%, 383 samples | 20x |
| FirePro M7740ATIBench 7%, 225 samples | 6x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 28% - Poor | Total price: $365 |