Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE

Performance Results


Gaming 84% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 73% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	87.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	44% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE (all builds)
Memory	11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161019
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 23 '17 at 17:28
Run Duration	191 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	17%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$242 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	94.1% Outstanding	Memory 94.1 1-Core 144 2-Core 269 94% 169 Pts	4-Core 506 8-Core 804 81% 655 Pts	64-Core 814 50% 814 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 94.1% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 8599) CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	87.2% Excellent	Lighting 110 Reflection 120 Parallax 102 90% 111 fps	MRender 97 Gravity 103 Splatting 99.2 82% 99.6 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 87.2% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX200 480GB-$160 11,290 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 85GB free Firmware: MU02.6 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 170 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 861 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 46 (A3) Unknown 100 100 495 (94) Unknown 100 100 23526 (95) Unknown 100 100 333 (96) Unknown 100 100 226 (97) Unknown 100 100 318 (A4) Unknown 100 100 7308 (A5) Unknown 100 100 24 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 5 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 8 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 32002357002264 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 47320 (F2) Unknown 100 100 124023 (F5) Unknown 100 100 86325 (F6) Unknown 100 100 94104 (F7) Unknown 100 100 0	74.9% Very good	Read 480 Write 247 Mixed 265 73% 331 MB/s	4K Read 24.2 4K Write 56.5 4K Mixed 24.8 98% 35.1 MB/s	DQ Read 304 DQ Write 178 DQ Mixed 46.9 87% 176 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 95%
Corsair Force 3 120GB-$109 22,358 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 32GB free Firmware: 5.02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 99 99 2597202 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 11355893548304 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3550 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 216 (B1) Unknown 0 0 8 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 128 129 545469300864 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 2597202 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 2597202 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 2597202 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 99 99 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 15378 (EA) Unknown 0 0 21512 (F1) Unknown 0 0 21512 (F2) Unknown 0 0 22543	50.9% Above average	Read 197 Write 114 Mixed 136 33% 149 MB/s	4K Read 19.9 4K Write 111 4K Mixed 12 104% 47.5 MB/s	DQ Read 159 DQ Write 128 DQ Mixed 39.8 58% 109 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 61%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 15GB free (System drive) Firmware: 605ABBF2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 10219268 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 -122896194202936 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1102 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 53 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 26 42 68722229274 (C2) HDA temperature 26 42 68722229274 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 10219268 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 10219268 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 10219268 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 111669149696 (E9) Unknown 0 0 3997 (EA) Unknown 0 0 3451 (F1) Unknown 0 0 3451 (F2) Unknown 0 0 8072 (F4) Unknown 100 100 2883598	44% Average	Read 478 Write 162 Mixed 241 64% 294 MB/s	4K Read 11 4K Write 18.1 4K Mixed 9.23 38% 12.7 MB/s	DQ Read 104 DQ Write 53.4 DQ Mixed 24.1 32% 60.5 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 85%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 229GB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 140 140 69 (03) Spinup time 131 131 21494432025 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 5195 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 9725 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1840 (C0) Power-off retract count 96 96 5195 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 5195 (C2) HDA temperature 176 176 193274642466 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	91.7% Outstanding	Read 162 Write 158 Mixed 131 112% 150 MB/s	4K Read 0.71 4K Write 1.74 4K Mixed 0.17 80% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 91.7% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 4000 C18 2x8GB 1,410 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	73.2% Very good	MC Read 28.4 MC Write 27.4 MC Mixed 20.1 72% 25.3 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 28.1 SC Mixed 24.3 67% 23.4 GB/s	Latency 59.5 67% 59.5 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 73.2% Great: 130%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS IX CODE Builds (Compare 1,298 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 106%

UFO

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 90%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE - $279

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $242Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	995x
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	94x
Core i7-7700k VHIntelBench 84%, 9,708 samples	62x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	252x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	197x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	95x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	55x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	50x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	46x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	59x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	41x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	32x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $1,155

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16