MSI GF615M-P31 (MS-7597)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics27.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMICRO-STAR MS-7597
MotherboardMSI GF615M-P31 (MS-7597)  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110922
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 28 '17 at 18:47
Run Duration95 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
57.9% Above average
Memory 83.9
1-Core 47.3
2-Core 94.2
49% 75.1 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 189
25% 188 Pts
64-Core 188
12% 188 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270-$140
CLim: 975 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
27.8% Poor
Lighting 35.1
Reflection 31.8
Parallax 42.6
29% 36.5 fps
MRender 28.3
Gravity 29.1
Splatting 37.1
26% 31.5 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 26%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 240GB-$199
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.22 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
32.4% Below average
Read 120
Write 104
Mixed 95.3
24% 106 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 38.4
4K Mixed 10.9
66% 23.5 MB/s
DQ Read 21.3
DQ Write 64.8
DQ Mixed 8.18
16% 31.5 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB 0h SDRAM
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.4% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 11.9
32% 11 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 8.6
21% 7.27 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback