HP Z400 Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	27.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	HP Z400 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0AE4h
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160224
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 31 '17 at 00:25
Run Duration	349 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon W3680-$180 6,658 User benchmarks, average bench 75% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	75% Very good	Memory 93 1-Core 79.7 2-Core 167 68% 113 Pts	4-Core 308 8-Core 527 51% 418 Pts	64-Core 644 40% 644 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 75% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100 111,509 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Asus(1043 8553) 2GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.31 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	27.4% Poor	Lighting 34.2 Reflection 32.5 Parallax 29.5 28% 32.1 fps	MRender 36.5 Gravity 30.4 Splatting 31 26% 32.6 fps
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 480GB 11,256 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 106GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	60.8% Good	Read 529 Write 276 Mixed 251 77% 352 MB/s	4K Read 8.54 4K Write 51 4K Mixed 8.85 51% 22.8 MB/s	DQ Read 134 DQ Write 216 DQ Mixed 8.76 53% 120 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 182%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82 64,359 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 978GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 171 168 4441 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5181 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 83 83 12948 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3722 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 233 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 4947 (C2) HDA temperature 118 107 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	50.5% Above average	Read 87.9 Write 88.3 Mixed 69.8 61% 82 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 0.39 4K Mixed 0.24 54% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 50.5% Great: 86%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 502GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 122 122 149964 (03) Spinup time 253 166 1208 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9446 (05) Reallocated sector count 175 175 487 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 67 67 24735 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 6317 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 747 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 1 1 1033093 (C2) HDA temperature 117 99 33 (C4) Reallocation count 1 1 259 (C5) Current pending sector count 198 196 793 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 199 1 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 157 1 11667	45.2% Average	Read 76.2 Write 81.5 Mixed 77.1 59% 78.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 0.31 4K Mixed 0.14 49% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 45.2% Great: 67%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82 64,359 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 430GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 174 172 4300 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5312 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 83 83 12990 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3722 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 231 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 5080 (C2) HDA temperature 118 109 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	59.7% Above average	Read 110 Write 97.8 Mixed 83.5 73% 97.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 1.76 4K Mixed 0.16 67% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 86%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 4TB 1,113 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 165GB free, PID d011 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	16.7% Very poor	Read 32.1 Write 28.7 Mixed 30.2 39% 30.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 1.83 4K Mixed 0.24 72% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 16.7% Great: 75%
829 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 26GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	6.32% Terrible	Read 24.7 Write 6.99 Mixed 9.01 14% 13.6 MB/s	4K Read 5.13 4K Write 0.002 4K Mixed 0.01 20% 1.71 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.32% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:01 98 99U5402-461.A00LF ID:01 98 99U5402-461.A00LF ID:01 98 9905402-544.A00LF ID:01 98 9905402-544.A00LF 50GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	31.1% Below average	MC Read 11 MC Write 9.8 MC Mixed 8.5 28% 9.77 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 8.6 SC Mixed 10.1 26% 8.9 GB/s	Latency 62.1 64% 62.1 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 31.1% Great: 32%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z400 Workstation Builds (Compare 3,317 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP Z400 Workstation

CPU
Xeon W3520Intel $230Bench 63%, 6,508 samples	569x
Xeon W3550IntelBench 66%, 7,649 samples	534x
Xeon W3565IntelBench 67%, 7,121 samples	488x

GPU
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	272x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	155x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	137x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	136x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	73x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	65x

RAM
ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 42GBUnknownBench 37%, 128 samples	22x
ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 46GBUnknownBench 45%, 108 samples	18x
ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 46GBUnknownBench 46%, 280 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $258

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16