Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	4.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SKTH, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	74.3% Very good	Memory 90.8 1-Core 88.4 2-Core 173 70% 117 Pts	4-Core 336 8-Core 336 45% 336 Pts	64-Core 338 21% 338 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% EVGA(3842 2712) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	4.03% Terrible	Lighting 4.87 Reflection 4.38 Parallax 4.44 4% 4.56 fps	MRender 4.67 Gravity 3.93 Splatting 6.17 4% 4.92 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.03% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD RE4 1TB (2010)-$55 23,775 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 164GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01V03 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 174 172 4258 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 636 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 69 69 23154 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 635 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 20 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 615 (C2) HDA temperature 117 107 2036510 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	47.9% Average	Read 85.4 Write 81.1 Mixed 27.5 47% 64.7 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.16 4K Mixed 0.3 115% 1.16 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 76%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB 17,632 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 487GB free, PID 61b6 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	11% Very poor	Read 27 Write 21.5 Mixed 23.8 30% 24.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.35 4K Write 0.76 4K Mixed 0.32 38% 0.48 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 11% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya M2F2G64CB88G7N-CG M2F2G64CB88G7N-CG M2F2G64CB88B7N-CG M2F2G64CB88G7N-CG 8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	51.4% Above average	MC Read 17.5 MC Write 18.6 MC Mixed 16.2 50% 17.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 17.1 46% 16 GB/s	Latency 66.1 60% 66.1 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	41x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	12x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	10x

SSD
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples	5x
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TBBench 70%, 46,239 samples	4x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	4x

RAM
HMT41GU6DFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 52%, 2,722 samples	7x
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	4x
M378B5173QH0-CK0 Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB M378B5173QH0-CK0 Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB 16GBSamsungBench 54%, 42 samples	4x

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $256

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16