Asus CG8480

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	20.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	72.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago.

System	Asus CG8480 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK CG8480
Memory	12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130103
Uptime	3 Days
Run Date	Jan 16 '16 at 14:14
Run Duration	113 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175 165,979 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	85.9% Excellent	Memory 94.4 1-Core 111 2-Core 213 81% 139 Pts	4-Core 427 8-Core 560 63% 493 Pts	64-Core 556 34% 556 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 85.9% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170 123,956 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Asus(1043 841D) 3GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6143 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	20.1% Poor	Lighting 23.7 Reflection 25.2 Parallax 29.3 19% 26.1 fps	MRender 34.6 Gravity 23.3 Splatting 23.4 22% 27.1 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 20.1% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX900 128GB-$103 6,500 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 38GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5.0.2a Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 104 104 7834002 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 47974784697198 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1886 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 69 (B1) Unknown 0 0 3 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 27 38 77311901723 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 7834002 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 7834002 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 7834002 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 10571 (EA) Unknown 0 0 9326 (F1) Unknown 0 0 9326 (F2) Unknown 0 0 11824	72.1% Very good	Read 487 Write 151 Mixed 214 62% 284 MB/s	4K Read 32.8 4K Write 102 4K Mixed 17.2 126% 50.6 MB/s	DQ Read 178 DQ Write 149 DQ Mixed 44.5 66% 124 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 82%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2TB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 138 138 75 (03) Spinup time 231 231 34377826524 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 3198 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 13354 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1883 (C0) Power-off retract count 97 97 3633 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 3633 (C2) HDA temperature 187 187 184684838944 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	92% Outstanding	Read 162 Write 159 Mixed 150 118% 157 MB/s	4K Read 1.09 4K Write 1.99 4K Mixed 0.2 104% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 92% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HY64C1C1624ZY 4x4GB 378 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	58.2% Above average	MC Read 21.5 MC Write 19.9 MC Mixed 17.4 56% 19.6 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 19.4 SC Mixed 20 54% 18.8 GB/s	Latency 58.8 68% 58.8 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CG8480 Builds (Compare 129 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

System: Asus CG8480

CPU
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	115x
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	10x
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	16x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	10x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	8x

SSD
U100 128GBSandiskBench 38%, 2,261 samples	19x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	7x
SUV500240G 240GBKingstonBench 75%, 13,649 samples	5x

RAM
HY64C1C1624ZY 4x4GBUnknownBench 56%, 378 samples	32x
SLA302G08-GGNHC 4x4GBUnknownBench 56%, 881 samples	18x
ASU16D3LU1KBG/8G 2x8GBKingstonBench 55%, 954 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $292

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16