Asrock X399 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 80% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 101% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	64.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X399 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	29 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170905
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 09 '18 at 21:35
Run Duration	205 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	21%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225 23,641 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	74% Very good	Memory 77.8 1-Core 125 2-Core 236 81% 146 Pts	4-Core 378 8-Core 700 64% 539 Pts	64-Core 2490 154% 2490 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 74% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% EVGA(3842 6183) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing below potential (71^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	105% Outstanding	Lighting 139 Reflection 147 Parallax 115 113% 134 fps	MRender 111 Gravity 117 Splatting 108 91% 112 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 461GB free Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 29 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 47 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 69 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 99 99 37833075	80.7% Excellent	Read 508 Write 410 Mixed 423 100% 447 MB/s	4K Read 32 4K Write 48.3 4K Mixed 25.9 107% 35.4 MB/s	DQ Read 67.3 DQ Write 60.3 DQ Mixed 14.6 24% 47.4 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 80.7% Great: 134%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 191GB free Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	163% Outstanding	Read 1,582 Write 1,087 Mixed 1,094 278% 1,254 MB/s	4K Read 39.2 4K Write 55.3 4K Mixed 16.6 110% 37 MB/s	DQ Read 33.5 DQ Write 63.2 DQ Mixed 35.5 31% 44.1 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 163% Great: 236%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 31GB free Firmware: 580ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 3498487 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 87 87 68281390083393 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1978 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 103 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 25 36 51541966873 (C2) HDA temperature 25 36 51541966873 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 3498487 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 3498487 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 3498487 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 99 99 4294967297 (E9) Unknown 0 0 778 (EA) Unknown 0 0 554 (F1) Unknown 0 0 554 (F2) Unknown 0 0 1156	48.7% Average	Read 509 Write 92.1 Mixed 147 54% 249 MB/s	4K Read 19.7 4K Write 54.5 4K Mixed 9.54 71% 27.9 MB/s	DQ Read 20.5 DQ Write 86.1 DQ Mixed 9.46 20% 38.7 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 73%
Samsung 850 Pro 128GB-$70 18,195 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 12GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 19588 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2123 (B1) Unknown 98 98 114 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 61 28 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 77 (F1) Unknown 99 99 23338471232	64.7% Good	Read 514 Write 274 Mixed 342 83% 377 MB/s	4K Read 25 4K Write 59.2 4K Mixed 14.6 88% 32.9 MB/s	DQ Read 28.1 DQ Write 49.8 DQ Mixed 15.6 18% 31.2 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 119%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$95 34,353 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2.5TB free Firmware: 0001 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 79 64 77558428 (03) Spinup time 94 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1373 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 69 60 7983552 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5128190953827 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1322 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 76 69 404029464 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 82 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 3779 (C2) HDA temperature 24 40 55834574872 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 6717328851994 (F1) Unknown 100 253 2953437052 (F2) Unknown 100 253 2036239705	92.7% Outstanding	Read 159 Write 165 Mixed 150 119% 158 MB/s	4K Read 0.71 4K Write 2.27 4K Mixed 0.26 100% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 92.7% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB 1,151 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	74% Very good	MC Read 28 MC Write 27.7 MC Mixed 25 77% 26.9 GB/s	SC Read 20.4 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 25.4 59% 20.8 GB/s	Latency 84.8 47% 84.8 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 74% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X399 Taichi Builds (Compare 561 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 99%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 120%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X399 Taichi

CPU
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	155x
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD $800Bench 78%, 10,440 samples	114x
Ryzen TR 2950XAMD $798Bench 81%, 10,169 samples	103x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	47x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,306Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	36x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	27x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	38x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	28x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	19x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	13x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	12x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GBG.SKILL $143Bench 95%, 14,506 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $913

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16