Asus P8H77-M LE

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Raft	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	25.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8H77-M LE (all builds)
Memory	4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140620
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 10 '18 at 10:02
Run Duration	229 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	36%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570 104,858 User benchmarks, average bench 65% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	81.2% Excellent	Memory 92.8 1-Core 105 2-Core 207 78% 135 Pts	4-Core 405 8-Core 391 54% 398 Pts	64-Core 398 25% 398 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 81.2% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362 42,960 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Nvidia(10DE 1000) 2GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.59 Performing below potential (44^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	25.3% Poor	Lighting 30.1 Reflection 30.8 Parallax 38.5 24% 33.1 fps	MRender 39.7 Gravity 35.4 Splatting 26.2 27% 33.8 fps
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 25.3% Great: 29%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 92GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 8469 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2494 (B1) Unknown 95 95 100 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 53 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 29 (F1) Unknown 99 99 50623464261
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Adata S396 30GB 52 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 16GB free Firmware: 5.0.2a Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 99 99 2624594 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 55551107008199 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5131 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 745 (B1) Unknown 0 0 8 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 38 107376672798 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 2624594 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 2624594 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 2624594 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 87 87 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 15879 (EA) Unknown 0 0 24402 (F1) Unknown 0 0 24402 (F2) Unknown 0 0 19645	29.3% Poor	Read 217 Write 38.6 Mixed 65.1 23% 107 MB/s	4K Read 18.2 4K Write 38.6 4K Mixed 7.84 58% 21.5 MB/s	DQ Read 32.1 DQ Write 39.3 DQ Mixed 8.96 14% 26.8 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 29.3% Great: 41%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 500GB 1,303 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 425GB free Firmware: 1.0. Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 37% Great: 174%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 277GB free Firmware: CC24 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 147849112 (03) Spinup time 96 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 87 87 13515 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 60 53 146062013111 (09) Power-on hours count 75 75 22708 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 5070 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 1 (BD) vendor-specific 93 93 7 (BE) vendor-specific 71 57 9077522461 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 223 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 37 37 127617 (C2) HDA temperature 29 43 -140737488355299 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 43044162249077 (F1) Unknown 100 253 28685130675 (F2) Unknown 100 253 28742373370	87.7% Excellent	Read 169 Write 137 Mixed 107 103% 138 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.09 4K Mixed 0.24 65% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 87.7% Great: 114%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89 48,059 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 247GB free Firmware: 1AG01118 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 97 0 (03) Spinup time 81 81 6440 (04) Start/Stop count 80 80 20082 (05) Reallocated sector count 96 96 105 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 31575 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 1 (0C) Power cycle count 93 93 6775 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 97 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 910 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 80 51 336265236 (C2) HDA temperature 75 50 420151321 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 550026 (C4) Reallocation count 97 97 105 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 99 19 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	44.7% Average	Read 86.9 Write 68.8 Mixed 99.2 65% 84.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.36 4K Write 1.36 4K Mixed 0.29 73% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB 78,181 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	62.1% Good	MC Read 22.6 MC Write 22.6 MC Mixed 19.4 62% 21.5 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 18.8 SC Mixed 18.8 53% 18.4 GB/s	Latency 62.4 64% 62.4 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H77-M LE Builds (Compare 761 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-M LE

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	158x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	124x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	50x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	67x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	58x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	31x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	47x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	25x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	18x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	32x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	21x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16