| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible. |
| Graphics | 17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
| System | INTEL_ DP35DP__ |
| Motherboard | Intel DP35DP (all builds) |
| Memory | 0.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20071002 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 11 '18 at 17:57 |
| Run Duration | 109 Seconds |
| Run User | LTU-User |
| Background CPU | 91% |
PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
18.8%
Very poor
|
15% 22.9 Pts
|
11% 87.8 Pts
|
6% 96.5 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Gainward(10B0 11C0) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.31
|
17.6%
Very poor
|
15% 22.3 fps
|
22% 27.4 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB-$80
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SD15 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
|
31.7%
Below average
|
34% 45.5 MB/s
|
61% 0.49 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 1024, 1024 MB
|
12.6%
Very poor
|
14% 4.8 GB/s
|
5% 1.63 GB/s
|
14% 296 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical DP35DP Builds (Compare 32 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Intel DP35DP - $100
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 12x |
| Core2 Duo E4600IntelBench 34%, 6,872 samples | 3x |
| Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 2x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples | 5x |
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 4x |
| GeForce 8400 GSNvidiaBench 1%, 18,254 samples | 3x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 32% - Below average | Total price: $289 |