PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 38.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 82.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock B85M (all builds) |
Memory | 12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20151217 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Jan 14 '18 at 18:15 |
Run Duration | 154 Seconds |
Run User | CAN-User |
Background CPU | 1% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
|
78.4%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1288 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.11.1
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
38.9%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
82.8%
Excellent
|
|||
75.8%
Very good
|
||||
UFD 3.0 Silicon-Power128 127GB
85GB free, PID 5500
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
|
38%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
63.1%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 22x |
Core i5-4440Intel $132Bench 61%, 81,111 samples | 17x |
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 17x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 14x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 14x |
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 11x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $479 |