Gigabyte GA-X99-Ultra Gaming-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 43% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	42% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	63.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Default string
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X99-Ultra Gaming-CF (all builds)
Memory	56.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160829
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Jan 15 '18 at 04:43
Run Duration	194 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	14%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6850K-$115 29,279 User benchmarks, average bench 84% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	89.8% Excellent	Memory 89.6 1-Core 118 2-Core 237 83% 148 Pts	4-Core 484 8-Core 770 77% 627 Pts	64-Core 949 59% 949 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 89.8% Great: 93%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% EVGA(3842 6274) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42% Average	Lighting 47.5 Reflection 54.8 Parallax 44.4 39% 48.9 fps	MRender 67.7 Gravity 47.4 Splatting 61.8 48% 58.9 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139 63,520 User benchmarks, average bench 266% 309GB free Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	238% Outstanding	Read 2,288 Write 1,565 Mixed 1,541 398% 1,798 MB/s	4K Read 31.2 4K Write 112 4K Mixed 32.8 148% 58.5 MB/s	DQ Read 40.5 DQ Write 243 DQ Mixed 30 56% 105 MB/s
Poor: 159% ↑ This bench: 238% Great: 353%
PNY CS2211 480GB-$70 2,197 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS221016 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 5679 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1039 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 1016 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1179740 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 107 (C2) HDA temperature 70 70 128850919454 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 5381	63.8% Good	Read 521 Write 290 Mixed 444 93% 418 MB/s	4K Read 23.9 4K Write 59.5 4K Mixed 11.6 82% 31.6 MB/s	DQ Read 26.3 DQ Write 40.7 DQ Mixed 11.2 15% 26.1 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 63.8% Great: 113%
Seagate Expansion 4TB 22,017 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 3.5TB free Firmware: 0708 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	68.3% Good	Read 127 Write 110 Mixed 81.7 79% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.77 4K Write 4.54 4K Mixed 0.46 168% 1.92 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 66%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 2TB 21,039 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0304 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	64.7% Good	Read 110 Write 116 Mixed 96.7 80% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.65 4K Write 1.92 4K Mixed 0.29 95% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 67%
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$174 9,888 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 393GB free Firmware: 81.H0A81 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 137 137 104 (03) Spinup time 136 136 38686425569 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 4397 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 128 128 18 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 5664 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 989 (C0) Power-off retract count 97 97 4409 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 4409 (C2) HDA temperature 176 176 197569609762 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	68.3% Good	Read 122 Write 116 Mixed 121 90% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0.84 4K Write 2.94 4K Mixed 0.47 142% 1.42 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMU32GX4M2C3200C16 4x16GB 624 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	MC Read 37.3 MC Write 48.8 MC Mixed 38.8 119% 41.6 GB/s	SC Read 12.9 SC Write 19.5 SC Mixed 19.4 49% 17.3 GB/s	Latency 67.7 59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 130%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X99-Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 358 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 88%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 79%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-Ultra Gaming-CF

CPU
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	138x
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	78x
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	45x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	53x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	48x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	26x

SSD
990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $121Bench 421%, 18,218 samples	13x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	11x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	9x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	14x
9965600-033.A00G 4x16GBUnknownBench 99%, 23 samples	9x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 82% - Excellent

Total price: $624

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16