PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 57.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 39.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-P55M-UD4 (all builds) |
Memory | 13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20100623 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jan 15 '18 at 09:45 |
Run Duration | 265 Seconds |
Run User | HUN-User |
Background CPU | 1% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
80.3%
Excellent
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 385.69
|
57.1%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
39.3%
Below average
|
||||
78.7%
Very good
|
||||
41.6%
Average
|
||||
9.92%
Terrible
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
|
52%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples | 23x |
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples | 9x |
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 7x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 3x |
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples | 3x |
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 3x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 61% - Good | Total price: $110 |