Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	74.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 960 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140408
Uptime	1.3 Days
Run Date	Jan 16 '18 at 04:32
Run Duration	187 Seconds
Run User	CRI-User
Background CPU	68%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	64.1% Good	Memory 82.4 1-Core 66.7 2-Core 134 58% 94.2 Pts	4-Core 248 8-Core 438 41% 343 Pts	64-Core 436 27% 436 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 64.1% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210 98,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% MSI(1462 8060) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.1% Terrible	Lighting 1.23 Reflection 2.38 Parallax 0.5 1% 1.37 fps	MRender 2.19 Gravity 0.87 Splatting 1.65 1% 1.57 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.1% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 71GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2105 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 514 (B1) Unknown 99 99 15 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 59 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 107 (F1) Unknown 99 99 5171264660	74.1% Very good	Read 376 Write 273 Mixed 295 70% 315 MB/s	4K Read 34.3 4K Write 53.3 4K Mixed 31.9 121% 39.8 MB/s	DQ Read 144 DQ Write 96.9 DQ Mixed 57.8 60% 99.4 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 74.1% Great: 124%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 298GB free Firmware: MS2O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 142 142 71 (03) Spinup time 117 117 12897747140 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 5952 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 115 115 34 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 7404 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1705 (C0) Power-off retract count 96 96 5983 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 5983 (C2) HDA temperature 193 193 188979937311 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	65.8% Good	Read 113 Write 116 Mixed 96.3 81% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.31 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.16 58% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 65.8% Great: 107%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 223GB free Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 597 (03) Spinup time 115 109 7233 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1029 (05) Reallocated sector count 157 157 340 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 13 13 63891 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 783 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 699 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 84 84 350994 (C2) HDA temperature 107 101 40 (C4) Reallocation count 48 48 152 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 17 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 199 15 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 199 19	31.8% Below average	Read 54.2 Write 56.9 Mixed 54.8 42% 55.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.37 4K Write 0.37 4K Mixed 0.17 41% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 57%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44 40,147 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 38GB free Firmware: 1AC0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 93 93 2940 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6372 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 7254 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 1 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1986 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 75 63 420413465 (C2) HDA temperature 71 62 487522333 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 3300 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	26.4% Poor	Read 38.8 Write 52.6 Mixed 46.7 35% 46 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 1.76 4K Mixed 0.44 106% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 26.4% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB 10,124 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	43.6% Average	MC Read 17.1 MC Write 14.4 MC Mixed 15 44% 15.5 GB/s	SC Read 9.6 SC Write 8.2 SC Mixed 12.1 28% 9.97 GB/s	Latency 76.2 52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,670 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 - $200

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	863x
FX-9590AMD $298Bench 63%, 26,109 samples	208x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	146x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	110x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	83x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	81x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	62x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	61x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	59x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	84x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 63%, 12,722 samples	45x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $630

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16