PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 34.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 67.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus Maximus II Formula (all builds) |
Memory | 0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20081217 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Jan 16 '18 at 12:22 |
Run Duration | 173 Seconds |
Run User | CHE-User |
Background CPU | 17% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
50%
Average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 280X-$500
AMD(1002 0B00) 3GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.12.2
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
34.7%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
67.7%
Good
|
||||
69.6%
Good
|
||||
Volume0 6TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0. Max speed: PIO DMA 16 MB/s
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR
|
26.3%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 14x |
Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples | 10x |
Core2 Extreme X9650Intel $850Bench 53%, 3,122 samples | 8x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 670Nvidia $435Bench 28%, 47,610 samples | 3x |
GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples | 3x |
R9 270XAMD $199Bench 27%, 77,943 samples | 2x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 26% - Poor | Total price: $624 |