Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.2%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics22.4% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 7 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display2048 x 1152 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 24 '16 at 18:48
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 91%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
AMD FX-6350 Six-Core-$98
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
48.2% Average
SC Int 66
SC Float 67.7
SC Mixed 69.1
54% 67.6 Pts
QC Int 262
QC Float 226
QC Mixed 232
54% 240 Pts
MC Int 382
MC Float 334
MC Mixed 370
54% 362 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD R7 360-$98
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1201.0
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
22.4% Poor
Lighting 63.1
Reflection 69.2
Parallax 79.4
21% 70.6 fps
MRender 46.1
Gravity 54.2
Splatting 68.1
26% 56.1 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 28%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
OCZ AMD Radeon R7 480GB-$195
308GB free
Firmware: 1.01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 4KALIGNED SSD TRIM S.M.A.R.T
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 433
Write 435
Mixed 444
98% 437 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 33.8
4K Mixed 13.6
65% 22.4 MB/s
DQ Read 21.2
DQ Write 49.9
DQ Mixed 11.7
16% 27.6 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 112%
Hitachi HDS724020ALE640 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: MJ6OA5K0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 7200 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
75.6% Very good
Read 139
Write 124
Mixed 126
98% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1.04
4K Write 1.83
4K Mixed 0.23
103% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBRL F3-12800CL8-4GBXM F3-12800CL9-4GBRL F3-12800CL8-4GBXM 16GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.1% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 13.1
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 9.5
SC Mixed 10.6
28% 9.77 GB/s
Latency 80.7
50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 50%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,629 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $709
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $300Nvidia GTX 1070 $330Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
Intel Core i5-7600K $229AMD RX 480 $238Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $146
Intel Pentium G4560 $60Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $219Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $179
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $50Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $127SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $90G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $700SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $46HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $114SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $13
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback