Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics38.3% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
6 months ago, 5 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory14.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171212
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 23 '18 at 15:57
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-8700K-$325
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
110% Outstanding
SC Int 132
SC Float 138
SC Mixed 135
108% 135 Pts
QC Int 530
QC Float 549
QC Mixed 540
122% 540 Pts
MC Int 1,010
MC Float 1,154
MC Mixed 1,096
162% 1,087 Pts
Poor: 93%
This bench: 110%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$155
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB; Palit Passive Cooled
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
38.3% Below average
Lighting 119
Reflection 79.9
Parallax 119
37% 106 fps
MRender 81.6
Gravity 112
Splatting 81.6
40% 91.7 fps
Poor: 34%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 42%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$386
925GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Read 530
Write 142
Mixed 212
64% 295 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 93.9
4K Mixed 21.1
132% 50.6 MB/s
DQ Read 38.3
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 83.8
62% 77.9 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 128%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$253
15GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 407
Mixed 416
99% 446 MB/s
4K Read 45.2
4K Write 92
4K Mixed 28.6
154% 55.3 MB/s
DQ Read 47
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 55
48% 69 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 135%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
105GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 89.3
Write 76.5
Mixed 74
60% 79.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.12
63% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 68%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
260GB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
21.1% Poor
Read 41.4
Write 42.7
Mixed 42
54% 42 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.84
4K Mixed 0.15
70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD2 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
82.6% Excellent
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 31
MC Mixed 25.6
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 33.1
SC Mixed 26.5
75% 26.1 GB/s
Latency 63.4
63% 63.4 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 94%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 3,102 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $138

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $957
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $325Nvidia GTX 1070 $380Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $95
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $240Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $120
Intel Core i5-8600K $240AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $155SanDisk Extreme 64GB $80
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $901SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $175SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback