Gigabyte GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 86% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 114% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	180% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte X399 DESIGNARE EX
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF (all builds)
Memory	26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171003
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 26 '18 at 07:34
Run Duration	162 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225 23,641 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	68.8% Good	Memory 52.9 1-Core 114 2-Core 224 69% 130 Pts	4-Core 452 8-Core 853 78% 653 Pts	64-Core 2,390 148% 2,390 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Gigabyte(1458 3752) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 390.65 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	128% Outstanding	Lighting 177 Reflection 191 Parallax 198 144% 188 fps	MRender 125 Gravity 178 Splatting 127 116% 144 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 128% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 382GB free Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	200% Outstanding	Read 1,870 Write 1,326 Mixed 1,212 325% 1,469 MB/s	4K Read 40.7 4K Write 57.8 4K Mixed 31.1 132% 43.2 MB/s	DQ Read 113 DQ Write 71.9 DQ Mixed 41.8 45% 75.7 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 200% Great: 254%
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70 27,495 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 205GB free Firmware: 521ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 4205004 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 117776593199627 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2533 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 1398 (B1) Unknown 0 0 3 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 17 41 34362425361 (C2) HDA temperature 17 41 34362425361 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 4205004 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 4205004 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 4205004 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 98 98 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 29068 (EA) Unknown 0 0 10253 (F1) Unknown 0 0 10253 (F2) Unknown 0 0 16825	68.3% Good	Read 454 Write 259 Mixed 318 76% 343 MB/s	4K Read 28.1 4K Write 62.1 4K Mixed 19.3 100% 36.5 MB/s	DQ Read 110 DQ Write 103 DQ Mixed 55.5 56% 89.3 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 94%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 140GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	180% Outstanding	Read 1,711 Write 1,148 Mixed 1,150 296% 1,336 MB/s	4K Read 39.9 4K Write 54.9 4K Mixed 26.5 123% 40.4 MB/s	DQ Read 117 DQ Write 74.6 DQ Mixed 39.8 45% 77.2 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 180% Great: 236%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 1.5TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 160 160 6966 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1116 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1178 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 292 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 14 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2961 (C2) HDA temperature 129 108 21 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	76.1% Very good	Read 131 Write 134 Mixed 140 102% 135 MB/s	4K Read 0.88 4K Write 2.51 4K Mixed 0.28 114% 1.22 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 76.1% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x16GB 245 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	34.2% Below average	MC Read 12.3 MC Write 11 MC Mixed 11.3 33% 11.5 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 13.9 SC Mixed 13.9 37% 13 GB/s	Latency 150 27% 150 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 34.2% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF Builds (Compare 213 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 123%

UFO

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 137%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF

CPU
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD $800Bench 78%, 10,440 samples	56x
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	53x
Ryzen TR 2950XAMD $798Bench 81%, 10,169 samples	47x

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	18x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,306Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	18x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	12x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $92Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	15x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	13x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $150Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	10x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GBG.SKILL $139Bench 95%, 14,506 samples	8x
F4 DDR4 3200 C16 8x8GBG.SKILLBench 125%, 648 samples	7x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 8x8GBCorsairBench 124%, 361 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $1,472

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16