Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	30.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 (all builds)
Memory	57.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20171207
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jan 31 '18 at 15:57
Run Duration	263 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$60 30,050 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	78.4% Very good	Memory 72.3 1-Core 120 2-Core 241 79% 145 Pts	4-Core 454 8-Core 786 75% 620 Pts	64-Core 1,254 78% 1,254 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 78.4% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7870-$203 42,130 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Gigabyte(1458 2554) 2GB CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.1.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	30.2% Below average	Lighting 38.3 Reflection 34.8 Parallax 47 31% 40 fps	MRender 28.7 Gravity 32.3 Splatting 39.8 28% 33.6 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 30.2% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Asmt106x- V0Fast 2TB 981GB free (System drive) Firmware: 140924 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1435 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 475 (A5) Unknown 100 100 11534479 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 37 (A8) Unknown 100 100 7 (A9) Unknown 100 100 832 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 2 (AE) Unknown 100 100 327 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 66 75 322123661346 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 171800526888 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 2755 (EA) Unknown 100 100 3125 (F1) Unknown 253 253 3006 (F2) Unknown 253 253 4867 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0

Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625 54,978 User benchmarks, average bench 223% 391GB free Firmware: 1B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	269% Outstanding	Read 2,307 Write 1,449 Mixed 1,601 395% 1,786 MB/s	4K Read 53.1 4K Write 161 4K Mixed 61.4 244% 92 MB/s	DQ Read 346 DQ Write 275 DQ Mixed 150 156% 257 MB/s
Poor: 138% ↑ This bench: 269% Great: 283%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$139 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 54GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3716 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 711 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 75 52 25 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 159 (F1) Unknown 99 99 4004433968
Poor: 80% Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$139 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 54GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3716 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 711 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 75 53 25 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 159 (F1) Unknown 99 99 4006267554
Poor: 80% Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$210 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 52GB free Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 10851 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1780 (B1) Unknown 99 99 42 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 45 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 35 (EB) Unknown 99 99 220 (F1) Unknown 99 99 20848782223	85% Excellent	Read 524 Write 266 Mixed 283 79% 358 MB/s	4K Read 33.1 4K Write 78 4K Mixed 32.8 134% 48 MB/s	DQ Read 193 DQ Write 130 DQ Mixed 92.6 88% 139 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 85% Great: 124%
WD Green 6TB (2014)-$223 4,204 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 525GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 190 179 9483 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4935 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 87 87 9567 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1909 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 302 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 189 189 33873 (C2) HDA temperature 118 91 34 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 22 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	49.8% Average	Read 88.8 Write 84.1 Mixed 77.4 63% 83.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.85 4K Write 2.46 4K Mixed 0.21 104% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 98%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 16GB-$17 2,906 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 12GB free, PID 5580 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	73% Very good	Read 189 Write 53.2 Mixed 60.9 103% 101 MB/s	4K Read 14.6 4K Write 9.94 4K Mixed 4.93 560% 9.81 MB/s	DQ Read 15.4 DQ Write 10.4 DQ Mixed 5.05 582% 10.3 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 81%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x16GB 2,982 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	73.4% Very good	MC Read 28.1 MC Write 26.3 MC Mixed 23.7 74% 26 GB/s	SC Read 20.1 SC Write 28.9 SC Mixed 23.9 69% 24.3 GB/s	Latency 96.3 42% 96.3 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 129%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	96x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	69x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	67x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	57x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	28x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	20x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	17x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $41Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $871

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)