Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Gunboat	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.45% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	58% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus M5A97 R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150626
Uptime	3.5 Days
Run Date	Feb 06 '18 at 22:29
Run Duration	172 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8300-$168 49,767 User benchmarks, average bench 58% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	64.6% Good	Memory 89.5 1-Core 61.6 2-Core 112 56% 87.6 Pts	4-Core 216 8-Core 384 36% 300 Pts	64-Core 387 24% 387 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 4% EVGA(3842 2633) 2GB CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	5.45% Terrible	Lighting 6.77 Reflection 7.23 Parallax 8.03 6% 7.34 fps	MRender 4.81 Gravity 7.27 Splatting 7.04 5% 6.37 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.45% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force GT 240GB-$499 4,125 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 84GB free Firmware: 5.05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 4251723 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 87 87 2534030716179 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3741 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 144 (B1) Unknown 0 0 4 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 31 64 51543801887 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 4251723 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 4251723 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 4251723 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 7748 (EA) Unknown 0 0 7151 (F1) Unknown 0 0 7151 (F2) Unknown 0 0 15731	63.4% Good	Read 480 Write 259 Mixed 341 80% 360 MB/s	4K Read 23.2 4K Write 42.7 4K Mixed 16.1 78% 27.3 MB/s	DQ Read 129 DQ Write 101 DQ Mixed 52.6 56% 94.2 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 63.4% Great: 92%
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35 20,420 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3767 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2419 (B1) Unknown 89 89 52 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 50 39 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 13 (F1) Unknown 99 99 12628240511	58% Above average	Read 446 Write 249 Mixed 256 70% 317 MB/s	4K Read 30.8 4K Write 34.3 4K Mixed 12.4 81% 25.9 MB/s	DQ Read 31.4 DQ Write 38.7 DQ Mixed 12.3 16% 27.5 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 110%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$78 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 70GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 177 176 6116 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 96 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 446 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 96 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 0 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 179 (C2) HDA temperature 119 117 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	42% Average	Read 78.4 Write 67.4 Mixed 74.1 55% 73.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.75 4K Write 2.09 4K Mixed 0.21 94% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 88%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$78 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 27GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 182 181 5900 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 111 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 520 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 111 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 0 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 245 (C2) HDA temperature 118 114 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	50.5% Above average	Read 97.2 Write 79 Mixed 65.5 60% 80.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.35 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.14 38% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 50.5% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x4GB 6,123 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	51.5% Above average	MC Read 21.6 MC Write 15.6 MC Mixed 18.2 53% 18.5 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 14.3 33% 11.5 GB/s	Latency 67.9 59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,813 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $89

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	864x
FX-6300AMD $57Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	644x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	436x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	186x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	159x
RX 480AMD $75Bench 46%, 261,163 samples	118x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	85x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	83x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	77x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	85x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	55x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	50x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $358

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16