Asrock A320M

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	28.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock A320M (all builds)
Memory	6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180116
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 06 '18 at 23:19
Run Duration	246 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	48%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon X4 950 Quad Core 4,334 User benchmarks, average bench 41% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	51.8% Above average	Memory 65.2 1-Core 69.3 2-Core 127 52% 87.2 Pts	4-Core 224 8-Core 221 30% 222 Pts	64-Core 225 14% 225 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Gigabyte(1458 3765) 2GB CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1758 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	28.8% Poor	Lighting 35.7 Reflection 26 Parallax 32.1 29% 31.3 fps	MRender 38.8 Gravity 33.1 Splatting 32.7 28% 34.9 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 28.8% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35 80,916 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 79GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3K87RA Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2119 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 422 (64) Unknown 100 100 3241984 (65) Unknown 100 100 474912 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 77 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 95 95 1911 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 708 (B7) Unknown 97 97 22 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 33 100 188978888737 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 95 95 5 (E9) Unknown 100 100 5912 (EA) Unknown 100 100 2761 (F1) Unknown 100 100 4246 (F2) Unknown 100 100 3164 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 0	48.5% Average	Read 456 Write 175 Mixed 185 59% 272 MB/s	4K Read 18.9 4K Write 23.2 4K Mixed 9 52% 17 MB/s	DQ Read 126 DQ Write 68.7 DQ Mixed 6.09 29% 66.8 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 82%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 814GB free Firmware: CC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 148770032 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1734 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 83 60 231567593 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 10859 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1799 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 4295032838 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 57 589365282 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 135 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 91 91 19366 (C2) HDA temperature 34 43 42949672994 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 23716809419349 (F1) Unknown 100 253 25659016979 (F2) Unknown 100 253 454324337769	104% Outstanding	Read 190 Write 173 Mixed 158 130% 174 MB/s	4K Read 0.72 4K Write 1.63 4K Mixed 0.2 82% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 112%
StoreJet Transcend 1TB 14,954 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 329GB free, PID 5106 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	35% Below average	Read 80 Write 80.1 Mixed 70.4 98% 76.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.55 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.4 80% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 35% Great: 45%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB 6,329 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 25GB free, PID 1665 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	8.57% Terrible	Read 24.2 Write 13.2 Mixed 12.7 19% 16.7 MB/s	4K Read 9.01 4K Write 0.02 4K Mixed 0.01 34% 3.01 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 8.57% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GB 46,352 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	27.2% Poor	MC Read 11.7 MC Write 7.4 MC Mixed 9.3 27% 9.47 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 7.5 19% 6.73 GB/s	Latency 113 35% 113 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A320M Builds (Compare 146 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M

CPU
Ryzen 3 1200AMD $100Bench 57%, 83,528 samples	52x
Ryzen 5 1400AMD $87Bench 61%, 71,313 samples	20x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	15x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	41x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	16x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	8x

SSD
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $89Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	5x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $129Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	4x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	3x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GBCorsair $50Bench 89%, 87,344 samples	7x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 2x8GBUnknownBench 75%, 25,824 samples	5x
DDR4 2400 2OZ 1x8GBAdataBench 42%, 10,940 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $298

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16