Asus X99-DELUXE II

Performance Results


Gaming 87% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 79% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	88.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	225% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus X99-DELUXE II (all builds)
Memory	9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170905
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Feb 08 '18 at 03:36
Run Duration	302 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103 50,196 User benchmarks, average bench 81% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	92.4% Outstanding	Memory 93.6 1-Core 116 2-Core 240 85% 150 Pts	4-Core 490 8-Core 783 78% 637 Pts	64-Core 966 60% 966 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 92.4% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 8599) CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	88.2% Excellent	Lighting 111 Reflection 120 Parallax 111 91% 114 fps	MRender 97.5 Gravity 102 Splatting 104 83% 101 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 88.2% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 350GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 6116 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 762 (B1) Unknown 98 98 31 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 55 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 40 (F1) Unknown 99 99 27281045244	95.9% Outstanding	Read 498 Write 405 Mixed 420 98% 441 MB/s	4K Read 35.9 4K Write 64.1 4K Mixed 40.8 141% 46.9 MB/s	DQ Read 251 DQ Write 91.6 DQ Mixed 94.7 90% 146 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 95.9% Great: 134%
Corsair Force MP500 NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB-$43 14,860 User benchmarks, average bench 151% 165GB free (System drive) Firmware: E7FM04.C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	225% Outstanding	Read 2,141 Write 1,335 Mixed 1,580 373% 1,685 MB/s	4K Read 34.9 4K Write 86.6 4K Mixed 45 156% 55.5 MB/s	DQ Read 258 DQ Write 181 DQ Mixed 88.2 102% 176 MB/s
Poor: 106% ↑ This bench: 225% Great: 210%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 169 168 4508 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 226 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 647 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 119 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 21 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1032 (C2) HDA temperature 119 104 28 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 7 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	65.8% Good	Read 111 Write 118 Mixed 129 90% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.79 4K Write 2.28 4K Mixed 0.25 103% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 65.8% Great: 84%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$79 133,734 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 991GB free Firmware: CC41 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 138248576 (03) Spinup time 95 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 508 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 67 60 5592195 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 4030 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 520 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 56 504365084 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 12 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 3993 (C2) HDA temperature 28 44 55834574876 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 22333829944094 (F1) Unknown 100 253 12594027925 (F2) Unknown 100 253 561928163668	72.4% Very good	Read 99.3 Write 152 Mixed 117 92% 123 MB/s	4K Read 0.75 4K Write 5.11 4K Mixed 0.8 215% 2.22 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 110%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 839GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 196 55 1309 (03) Spinup time 253 169 1233 (04) Start/Stop count 88 88 12295 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 71 71 21582 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5211 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 398 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 176 176 72550 (C2) HDA temperature 122 107 28 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	56.1% Above average	Read 91.8 Write 104 Mixed 94.5 73% 96.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.62 4K Write 1.46 4K Mixed 0.1 64% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 56.1% Great: 67%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82 64,359 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 211GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 53 (03) Spinup time 168 166 4575 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1266 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 9094 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1265 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 260 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 197 197 10737 (C2) HDA temperature 119 100 28 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	80.5% Excellent	Read 155 Write 126 Mixed 114 98% 132 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 1.87 4K Mixed 0.21 80% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 80.5% Great: 86%
Hitachi HDN724030ALE640 3TB 4,385 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 28GB free Firmware: MJ8OA5E0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 136 136 81 (03) Spinup time 139 139 38681182702 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 4420 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 119 119 35 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 5071 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 621 (C0) Power-off retract count 97 97 4669 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 4669 (C2) HDA temperature 193 193 197569347615 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	57.8% Above average	Read 104 Write 97.5 Mixed 97.9 75% 99.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.77 4K Write 1.27 4K Mixed 0.17 74% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 88%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150 16,916 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 2504 (03) Spinup time 175 174 6225 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3871 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 8433 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 697 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 251 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 187 187 40085 (C2) HDA temperature 119 91 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 195 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 195 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 16 (C8) Write error rate 200 194 0	26% Poor	Read 48.4 Write 42 Mixed 47.4 35% 45.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 1.53 4K Mixed 0.16 65% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 26% Great: 55%
ASMT 2105 1TB 1,332 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 93GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	66.4% Good	Read 177 Write 161 Mixed 127 193% 155 MB/s	4K Read 0.37 4K Write 1.78 4K Mixed 0.23 70% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C15 4x4GB 2,538 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	109% Outstanding	MC Read 40.5 MC Write 49 MC Mixed 37.5 121% 42.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.6 SC Write 18.8 SC Mixed 19.9 50% 17.4 GB/s	Latency 60.8 66% 60.8 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-DELUXE II Builds (Compare 847 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 89%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE II - $452

CPU
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	200x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	169x
Core i7-6900KIntel $120Bench 86%, 6,755 samples	97x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	177x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	86x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	63x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	42x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	40x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	36x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	18x
CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 32GBCorsairBench 134%, 17 samples	16x
CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3400C16 CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- CMD16GX4M4B3200C16- 32GBCorsairBench 127%, 15 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $1,076

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus X99-DELUXE II

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE II - $452

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)