ADD TO PC
BUILD

Casper EXCALIBUR

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Raft	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	26.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	42.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Casper EXCALIBUR (all builds)
Motherboard	CASPER CASPER EXCALIBUR
Memory	11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170206
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 09 '18 at 21:09
Run Duration	304 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	76.7% Very good	Memory 75.3 1-Core 108 2-Core 216 74% 133 Pts	4-Core 420 8-Core 603 64% 512 Pts	64-Core 602 37% 602 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 76.7% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile) 160,694 User benchmarks, average bench 23% Quanta(152D 1163) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9065 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	26.2% Poor	Lighting 33.4 Reflection 24.8 Parallax 30.8 27% 29.7 fps	MRender 36 Gravity 33 Splatting 22.6 24% 30.5 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 26.2% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLF128HCHP-00000 128GB 6,038 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 26GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXT2101Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1618 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 428 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 98 98 29 (AE) Unknown 99 99 3 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 1059 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 52 40 48 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 98 98 16533945 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2287 (F2) Unknown 99 99 2455 (F9) Unknown 99 99 3712	42.4% Average	Read 490 Write 38 Mixed 67.1 42% 198 MB/s	4K Read 21.1 4K Write 15.9 4K Mixed 10.6 54% 15.9 MB/s	DQ Read 178 DQ Write 26.1 DQ Mixed 22.5 37% 75.7 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 59%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100M 1TB 6,695 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 843GB free Firmware: AX1P1A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1893 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 223 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 400 (0A) Spinup retry count 104 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 158 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 3 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 0 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 3398 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 167504969760 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 100 100 61 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 269 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	61.6% Good	Read 110 Write 104 Mixed 102 79% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 1.54 4K Mixed 0.2 71% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4SFS8213.C8FAD1 2x8GB 273 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	63.8% Good	MC Read 23.9 MC Write 25.4 MC Mixed 19.3 65% 22.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 22.8 SC Mixed 18.9 54% 18.8 GB/s	Latency 89.8 45% 89.8 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 63.8% Great: 73%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical EXCALIBUR Builds (Compare 165 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Casper EXCALIBUR

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	122x
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples	43x

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	73x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	34x
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples	24x

SSD
MZNLF128HCHP-00000 128GBSamsungBench 47%, 6,038 samples	64x
MZNLN256HMHQ-00000 256GBSamsungBench 96%, 10,917 samples	35x
MZNTY256HDHP-00000 256GBSamsungBench 87%, 2,168 samples	9x

RAM
CT8G4SFS824A.C8FHD1 2x8GBCrucialBench 70%, 580 samples	22x
CT16G4SFD8213.C16FAD 2x16GBCrucialBench 73%, 680 samples	21x
CT8G4SFD8213.C16FBD1 2x8GBCrucialBench 73%, 670 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback