MSI Z370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B45)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive80.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B45
MotherboardMSI Z370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B45)  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170901
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '18 at 13:57
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 26%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Memory 96.4
1-Core 136
2-Core 270
94% 167 Pts
4-Core 519
8-Core 869
84% 694 Pts
64-Core 1,127
70% 1,127 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
104% Outstanding
Lighting 135
Reflection 143
Parallax 124
110% 134 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 130
Splatting 105
94% 116 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 104%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme 240GB-$200
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R201 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Read 495
Write 204
Mixed 300
73% 333 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 21.7
130% 51.6 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 61
94% 177 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 91%
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100
32GB free
Firmware: M0CR040 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Read 481
Write 333
Mixed 334
85% 383 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 73.2
4K Mixed 23.4
108% 40.9 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 36.9
78% 158 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 95%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
259GB free
Firmware: 17.01H17 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 93.7
Write 95.1
Mixed 100
73% 96.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.11
4K Write 1.04
4K Mixed 0.1
36% 0.42 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 69%
Seagate ST3500630AS 500GB-$102
158GB free
Firmware: 3.CHN Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
28.5% Poor
Read 46.8
Write 52.3
Mixed 57.1
40% 52.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 1.49
4K Mixed 0.28
73% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 43%
Samsung HD400LJ 400GB-$85
9GB free
Firmware: ZZ100-15 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
30.5% Below average
Read 53.4
Write 52.8
Mixed 51.9
40% 52.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.29
4K Write 1.26
4K Mixed 0.29
68% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 41%
WD My Passport 0820 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Read 99
Write 89.8
Mixed 64.7
105% 84.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.58
4K Mixed 0.18
62% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
97.9% Outstanding
MC Read 38.2
MC Write 37.8
MC Mixed 27.5
99% 34.5 GB/s
SC Read 20.6
SC Write 40.3
SC Mixed 29.9
86% 30.3 GB/s
Latency 52.5
76% 52.5 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 97.9%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B45) Builds (Compare 3,948 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI Z370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B45) - $206

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $964
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback