| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 57.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
| System | Supermicro X10SAE (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Supermicro X10SAE |
| Memory | 13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20140509 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 13 '18 at 23:03 |
| Run Duration | 152 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 11% |
PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
81.6%
Excellent
|
80% 142 Pts
|
64% 509 Pts
|
36% 579 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R9 290X-$549
CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1300 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.2.1
|
57.8%
Above average
|
59% 73.4 fps
|
56% 66.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: SC23 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
72.4%
Very good
|
82% 111 MB/s
|
77% 0.71 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33
882GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC49 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
99.6%
Outstanding
|
93% 128 MB/s
|
71% 0.76 MB/s
| |
|
|
13.3%
Very poor
|
22% 20.9 MB/s
|
89% 2.06 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial CT51264BA160BJ.C8F 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
57.3%
Above average
|
56% 19.7 GB/s
|
53% 18.5 GB/s
|
55% 73.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X10SAE Builds (Compare 66 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Supermicro X10SAE
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-4770SIntel $102Bench 71%, 13,157 samples | 10x |
| Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 8x |
| Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples | 8x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 10x |
| GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples | 5x |
| HD Graphics P4600IntelBench 3%, 2,141 samples | 4x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 66% - Good | Total price: $330 |