Dell Precision T1500

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	12.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Dell Precision T1500
Motherboard	Dell Precision T1500 (all builds)
Memory	5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110113
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 15 '18 at 03:26
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-750-$72 43,796 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	70.2% Very good	Memory 92.9 1-Core 70.7 2-Core 137 62% 100 Pts	4-Core 276 8-Core 279 37% 277 Pts	64-Core 281 17% 281 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 70.2% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 6850 31,600 User benchmarks, average bench 12% Gigabyte(1458 21F8) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	12.1% Very poor	Lighting 15.9 Reflection 12.5 Parallax 13.3 13% 13.9 fps	MRender 11 Gravity 10.5 Splatting 15.7 10% 12.4 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 12.1% Great: 13%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST3500620AS 500GB-$145 5,462 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 379GB free Firmware: HP24 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 103 99 5897995 (03) Spinup time 95 91 0 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5642 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 1 (07) Seek error rate 73 60 60472577878 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 13558 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 11 (0C) Power cycle count 97 37 3224 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 92 92 8 (BC) Unknown 100 99 4 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 52 606273572 (C2) HDA temperature 36 48 38654705700 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 25 24 5897995 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 1 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	51.1% Above average	Read 92.2 Write 86 Mixed 29.3 51% 69.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.36 4K Write 0.98 4K Mixed 0.34 71% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 59%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32 118,349 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 203GB free Firmware: AM0P1D Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1357 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 288 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 1878 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 4486 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 354 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 525 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 45291 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 210454183968 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 21260367 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 75105800 (F0) Head flying hours 97 97 1550 (F1) Unknown 100 100 7738245746 (F2) Unknown 100 100 5606408093 (FE) Unknown 100 100 0	44.4% Average	Read 75 Write 79.7 Mixed 29.1 45% 61.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.35 4K Write 1.55 4K Mixed 0.21 67% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 44.4% Great: 60%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36 203,102 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 181GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC45 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 144480992 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 930 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 83 60 230495247 (09) Power-on hours count 78 78 19314 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 466 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 98 8590065854 (BD) vendor-specific 91 91 9 (BE) vendor-specific 60 51 673513512 (C2) HDA temperature 40 49 64424509480 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 53 30 144480992 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 118725780983737 (F1) Unknown 100 253 3083031932 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3195738474	53.4% Above average	Read 102 Write 84 Mixed 34.7 54% 73.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.76 4K Write 1.48 4K Mixed 0.59 125% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5673EH1-CH9 Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 M378B5673EH1-CH9 Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 8GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	41.6% Average	MC Read 16.2 MC Write 12.8 MC Mixed 13.5 40% 14.2 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 9.4 SC Mixed 10.7 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 62.3 64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 41.6% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Precision T1500 Builds (Compare 413 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell Precision T1500

CPU
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	148x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	120x
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	63x

GPU
Quadro FX 580NvidiaBench 2%, 5,936 samples	34x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	33x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	21x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	18x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	14x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	14x

RAM
M378B5673FH0-CH9 4x2GBSamsungBench 42%, 2,488 samples	24x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	9x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 4x4GBHynixBench 48%, 2,925 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $367

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16