EVGA 132-BL-E758

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Raft	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	29.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	EVGA 132-BL-E758 (all builds)
Memory	6.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100511
Uptime	4 Days
Run Date	Feb 16 '18 at 04:30
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 X 980-$148 8,133 User benchmarks, average bench 76% Socket 423, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	76.8% Very good	Memory 92.1 1-Core 85.2 2-Core 165 69% 114 Pts	4-Core 332 8-Core 525 53% 429 Pts	64-Core 657 41% 657 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 76.8% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7870-$203 42,130 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Sapphire(174B E241) 2GB CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.2.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	29.5% Poor	Lighting 37.4 Reflection 33.8 Parallax 45.7 30% 39 fps	MRender 29.2 Gravity 31.4 Splatting 38.3 28% 33 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 91GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 8437 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 46 (B1) Unknown 99 99 11 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 22 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 9 (F1) Unknown 99 99 6902320958	48.3% Average	Read 232 Write 176 Mixed 183 44% 197 MB/s	4K Read 29.2 4K Write 41.1 4K Mixed 17.7 89% 29.4 MB/s	DQ Read 30.9 DQ Write 58.3 DQ Mixed 16.8 21% 35.3 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 124%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2.5TB free Firmware: CC52 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 99 199190632 (03) Spinup time 92 91 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1264 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 75 60 38657860 (09) Power-on hours count 65 65 31433 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 125 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 131074 (BD) vendor-specific 96 96 4 (BE) vendor-specific 68 30 14173964075040 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 35 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 1 1 299093 (C2) HDA temperature 32 70 68719476768 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 1520418432629 (F1) Unknown 100 253 11504013536 (F2) Unknown 100 253 6865956492	53% Above average	Read 93.7 Write 91.3 Mixed 94.8 70% 93.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.33 4K Write 0.88 4K Mixed 0.12 44% 0.45 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 96%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 195GB free Firmware: 05.00K05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 253 253 6133 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4396 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 22 22 57337 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 354 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 166 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 4396 (C2) HDA temperature 119 76 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	43.1% Average	Read 67.1 Write 82.8 Mixed 72.3 56% 74.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 2.01 4K Mixed 0.28 86% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6x2GB 38,297 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 6 of 6 slots used 12GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	39.7% Below average	MC Read 14.8 MC Write 11.6 MC Mixed 14.8 39% 13.7 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 10 25% 8.6 GB/s	Latency 63.9 63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 39.7% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 132-BL-E758 Builds (Compare 144 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 33%

Sail boat

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: EVGA 132-BL-E758

CPU
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	69x
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	13x
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples	11x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	12x
GeForce GTX 690 (SLI Disabled)NvidiaBench 40%, 5,438 samples	7x
GTX 260Nvidia $250Bench 7%, 11,945 samples	7x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	7x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	6x

RAM
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	43x
3x2GBUnknownBench 30%, 45,030 samples	20x
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $399

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16