Asus P8Z77-V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics39.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120326
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '18 at 11:55
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Memory 91
1-Core 115
2-Core 229
82% 145 Pts
4-Core 459
8-Core 459
61% 459 Pts
64-Core 461
28% 461 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.12.2
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Lighting 51.3
Reflection 34.1
Parallax 67.3
42% 50.9 fps
MRender 32.2
Gravity 49.4
Splatting 42.3
34% 41.3 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Read 371
Write 284
Mixed 293
70% 316 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 45.4
4K Mixed 13.4
71% 26.2 MB/s
DQ Read 199
DQ Write 77.6
DQ Mixed 58.9
64% 112 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 76%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
53% Above average
Read 81.7
Write 103
Mixed 3.22
45% 62.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 1.45
4K Mixed 0.15
58% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 53%
Great: 83%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40
568GB free
Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 117
Write 119
Mixed 111
87% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.81
4K Write 0.86
4K Mixed 0.26
79% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 113%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 124GB
21GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
24.1% Poor
Read 109
Write 18.7
Mixed 26.3
48% 51.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.11
4K Write 1.14
4K Mixed 0.54
69% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
62.8% Good
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 23.4
MC Mixed 19.5
62% 21.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 19.2
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 65.7
61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-V Builds (Compare 2,109 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $391
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback