PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 29.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Motherboard | Asus StrikerExtreme (all builds) |
Memory | 5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit kolorów |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20100301 |
Uptime | 2.1 Days |
Run Date | Feb 16 '18 at 21:46 |
Run Duration | 128 Seconds |
Run User | POL-User |
Background CPU | 61% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Quad Q6700-$44
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
|
43.8%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Gigabyte(1458 361C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
|
29.5%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
55.2%
Above average
|
||||
53.6%
Above average
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
14.8%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Duo E6850Intel $57Bench 40%, 4,150 samples | 3x |
Core2 Quad Q9400Intel $170Bench 46%, 24,176 samples | 2x |
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 2x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce 8800 UltraNvidiaBench 6%, 122 samples | 3x |
GTX 570Nvidia $350Bench 20%, 22,303 samples | 2x |
GTX 670Nvidia $435Bench 28%, 47,610 samples | 1x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 61% - Good | Total price: $57 |