Asus ROG STRIX B350-F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 71% Battleship	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 66% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	87.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	93.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX B350-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180122
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 16 '18 at 23:20
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	76% Very good	Memory 74.5 1-Core 106 2-Core 207 72% 129 Pts	4-Core 416 8-Core 704 68% 560 Pts	64-Core 862 53% 862 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 76% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 8599) CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	87.1% Excellent	Lighting 111 Reflection 117 Parallax 102 91% 110 fps	MRender 97.6 Gravity 100 Splatting 96 80% 97.9 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 87.1% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 85GB free Firmware: 0C3G37R5 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 73 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1018 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 634 (64) Unknown 100 100 397904 (65) Unknown 100 100 71520 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 6 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 172 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 774 (B7) Unknown 100 100 2 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 26 100 171799740442 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 73 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 73 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 937 (EA) Unknown 100 100 627 (F1) Unknown 100 100 589 (F2) Unknown 100 100 1184 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 507	56.4% Above average	Read 479 Write 236 Mixed 240 70% 318 MB/s	4K Read 29.6 4K Write 34.5 4K Mixed 9.52 75% 24.5 MB/s	DQ Read 29.4 DQ Write 35.2 DQ Mixed 8.75 13% 24.5 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 88%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 868 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 491 (B1) Unknown 99 99 14 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 60 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 3 (F1) Unknown 99 99 7821732598	93.3% Outstanding	Read 511 Write 415 Mixed 419 100% 449 MB/s	4K Read 40.2 4K Write 65.8 4K Mixed 39.4 146% 48.5 MB/s	DQ Read 40.7 DQ Write 72.3 DQ Mixed 22.6 27% 45.2 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 93.3% Great: 124%
WD Gold 1TB (2016)-$50 2,872 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 711GB free Firmware: RR07 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 144 143 3791 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 455 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 432 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 225 (10) Unknown 0 200 2864992242 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 1 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 840 (C2) HDA temperature 116 113 27 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0
Poor: 57% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB 122,822 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	88.6% Excellent	MC Read 34.2 MC Write 33.3 MC Mixed 29.6 92% 32.4 GB/s	SC Read 21.2 SC Write 31.7 SC Mixed 24.9 74% 25.9 GB/s	Latency 91.3 44% 91.3 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 88.6% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX B350-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,839 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 45%

Yacht

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 42%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B350-F GAMING - $120

CPU
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	662x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	369x
Ryzen 5 1600XAMD $125Bench 74%, 140,440 samples	334x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	358x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	309x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	258x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	157x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	119x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	115x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	229x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	118x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	111x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 92% - Outstanding

Total price: $469

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16