Asus Crosshair IV Formula

Performance Results


Gaming 54% Yacht	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 46% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	74.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	50.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus Crosshair IV Formula (all builds)
Memory	14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111028
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 17 '18 at 22:58
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-9590-$298 26,109 User benchmarks, average bench 63% AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 5.05 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	70.2% Very good	Memory 90.1 1-Core 79.5 2-Core 145 64% 105 Pts	4-Core 273 8-Core 495 46% 384 Pts	64-Core 497 31% 497 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 70.2% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500 167,107 User benchmarks, average bench 59% MSI(1462 3170) CLim: 1625 MHz, MLim: 1987 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	74.2% Very good	Lighting 95.5 Reflection 94.9 Parallax 84.5 78% 91.6 fps	MRender 90.8 Gravity 83.9 Splatting 74.7 67% 83.1 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 74.2% Great: 66%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force LE 120GB 3,209 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFC12.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 27746 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 764 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 4077 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 806 (A2) Unknown 0 0 3281355014215 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1441857 (AE) Unknown 100 100 434 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 93282 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 434 (C2) HDA temperature 70 70 128850984990 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 764 (DA) Unknown 100 100 260 (E7) Temperature 100 100 98 (F1) Unknown 100 100 3076 (F2) Unknown 100 100 6630	50.9% Above average	Read 507 Write 255 Mixed 330 80% 364 MB/s	4K Read 2.89 4K Write 26.1 4K Mixed 9.6 30% 12.9 MB/s	DQ Read 155 DQ Write 89.7 DQ Mixed 44.9 54% 96.4 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 92%
Seagate ST31500541AS 1.5TB 9,968 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 55GB free Firmware: CC94 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 221883384 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 37 37 65535 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 66 60 4697823 (09) Power-on hours count 86 86 12976 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2829 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 21475295239 (BD) vendor-specific 98 98 2 (BE) vendor-specific 74 45 437911578 (C2) HDA temperature 26 55 51539607578 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 46 30 221883384 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 115766548512936 (F1) Unknown 100 253 2067653275 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3681115933	39.5% Below average	Read 64 Write 73.6 Mixed 52.5 47% 63.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 1.27 4K Mixed 0.37 84% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 F3-12800CL9-4GBXL CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 16GB 58 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1333, 1600, 1333, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	55.2% Above average	MC Read 21.5 MC Write 18.7 MC Mixed 19.2 57% 19.8 GB/s	SC Read 12.4 SC Write 10.9 SC Mixed 15.5 37% 12.9 GB/s	Latency 67.1 60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Crosshair IV Formula Builds (Compare 280 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 25%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Formula

CPU
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	120x
Phenom II X6 1100TAMD $340Bench 59%, 12,769 samples	34x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	31x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	15x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	12x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	10x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	18x
INTENSO 240GBBench 77%, 887 samples	8x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	7x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	8x
F3-16000CL9-2GBRH F3-16000CL9-2GBRH F3-16000CL9-2GBRH F3-16000CL9-2GBRH 8GBUnknownBench 39%, 26 samples	5x
F3-10666CL9-4GBRL F3-10666CL9-4GBRL 8GBUnknownBench 44%, 282 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $520

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16