Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming

Performance Results


Gaming 51% Yacht	Desktop 103% UFO	Workstation 45% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	42.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming (all builds)
Memory	10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171031
Uptime	6.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 19 '18 at 11:45
Run Duration	181 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	9%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8600K-$173 264,837 User benchmarks, average bench 91% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Memory 97 1-Core 154 2-Core 310 102% 187 Pts	4-Core 620 8-Core 874 94% 747 Pts	64-Core 904 56% 904 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 101%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% EVGA(3842 6183) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 390.77 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42.3% Average	Lighting 47.7 Reflection 55.1 Parallax 44.8 39% 49.2 fps	MRender 68.3 Gravity 47.8 Splatting 62.3 49% 59.5 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 328GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1291 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 241 (B1) Unknown 99 99 5 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 47 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 61 (F1) Unknown 99 99 7297439547	105% Outstanding	Read 510 Write 406 Mixed 413 99% 443 MB/s	4K Read 44.3 4K Write 104 4K Mixed 40.3 174% 62.9 MB/s	DQ Read 45.6 DQ Write 277 DQ Mixed 28.3 61% 117 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 134%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109 37,250 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 92GB free Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 19521 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2448 (B1) Unknown 77 77 823 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 60 27 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 1 (EB) Unknown 99 99 576 (F1) Unknown 99 99 78137126293	71.9% Very good	Read 507 Write 271 Mixed 301 79% 360 MB/s	4K Read 22.1 4K Write 62.3 4K Mixed 19.1 91% 34.5 MB/s	DQ Read 287 DQ Write 69.3 DQ Mixed 57.6 74% 138 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 71.9% Great: 76%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 38GB free Firmware: 605ABBF2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 4383468 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 124571231461891 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 951 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 181 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 26 34 60131770394 (C2) HDA temperature 26 34 60131770394 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 4383468 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 4383468 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 4383468 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 95 95 107374182401 (E9) Unknown 0 0 7836 (EA) Unknown 0 0 1188 (F1) Unknown 0 0 1188 (F2) Unknown 0 0 3350 (F4) Unknown 99 99 3080239	67.7% Good	Read 442 Write 127 Mixed 180 54% 250 MB/s	4K Read 33.4 4K Write 113 4K Mixed 14.8 129% 53.6 MB/s	DQ Read 109 DQ Write 139 DQ Mixed 37.2 52% 95 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2TB free Firmware: CC24 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 96 175933480 (03) Spinup time 95 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3308 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 56 54 966469034139 (09) Power-on hours count 78 78 19317 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2418 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 36 36 64 (BC) Unknown 100 99 4295032834 (BD) vendor-specific 88 88 12 (BE) vendor-specific 67 54 9178578977 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 557 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 1 1 213743 (C2) HDA temperature 33 46 -140737488355295 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 99 136 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 99 136 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -99381248248349 (F1) Unknown 100 253 30923878893 (F2) Unknown 100 253 50804725458	94.4% Outstanding	Read 165 Write 164 Mixed 167 125% 165 MB/s	4K Read 0.92 4K Write 1.26 4K Mixed 0.31 96% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 94.4% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB 17,029 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	92.9% Outstanding	MC Read 34.4 MC Write 34.9 MC Mixed 27.8 92% 32.4 GB/s	SC Read 22.1 SC Write 36.4 SC Mixed 29.7 84% 29.4 GB/s	Latency 50.3 80% 50.3 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 92.9% Great: 108%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 3,021 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 93%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 93%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 85%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming - $170

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	1,423x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	670x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	271x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	363x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	314x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	227x

SSD
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	105x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	99x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	93x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	131x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	93x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	92x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $844

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16