| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 36.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | Asus P8B75-V (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20140318 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 23 '18 at 10:16 |
| Run Duration | 386 Seconds |
| Run User | CZE-User |
| Background CPU | 4% |
PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
68.2%
Good
|
72% 119 Pts
|
32% 238 Pts
|
15% 238 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.77
|
36.6%
Below average
|
39% 44.4 fps
|
31% 38.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
50.7%
Above average
|
48% 66.2 MB/s
|
73% 0.78 MB/s
| |
|
General UDisk 8GB
7GB free, PID null
|
3.9%
Terrible
|
7% 6.75 MB/s
|
21% 1.9 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 1600 CL9 Series 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
64%
Good
|
64% 22.2 GB/s
|
50% 17.6 GB/s
|
74% 54.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P8B75-V Builds (Compare 1,136 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P8B75-V
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 222x |
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 149x |
| Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 88x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 88x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 67x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 58x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 77% - Very good | Total price: $442 |