Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20141125
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '18 at 03:32
Run Duration623 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 945
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
51% Above average
Memory 82.4
1-Core 42.9
2-Core 84.2
47% 69.8 Pts
4-Core 117
8-Core 119
16% 118 Pts
64-Core 125
8% 125 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 51%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000
Nvidia(10DE 084A) 1GB
CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 372.95
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 6% Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ VERTEX3 90GB
22GB free
Firmware: 2.15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40% Average
Read 190
Write 98.3
Mixed 127
30% 138 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 55.7
4K Mixed 11.2
84% 31.1 MB/s
DQ Read 30.8
DQ Write 76.3
DQ Mixed 11.4
21% 39.5 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 40%
Great: 77%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
3TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Read 158
Write 161
Mixed 86.9
100% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.98
4K Write 2.95
4K Mixed 0.28
127% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 101%
WD Black 1.5TB (2010)
728GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
68.5% Good
Read 114
Write 124
Mixed 26.6
64% 88.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 2.49
4K Mixed 0.31
106% 1.14 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 85%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
668GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 05.00K05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 97.1
Write 95.7
Mixed 58.6
62% 83.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 2.25
4K Mixed 0.37
101% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 76%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
562GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Read 148
Write 143
Mixed 94.4
95% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.86
4K Write 1.84
4K Mixed 0.29
102% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 109%
FCR-HS3 -1 134GB
109GB free, PID 6348
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
3.33% Terrible
Read 2.19
Write 6.54
Mixed 3.24
6% 3.99 MB/s
4K Read 1.67
4K Write 0.39
4K Mixed 0.4
33% 0.82 MB/s
FCR-HS3 -3 32GB
30GB free, PID 6348
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Read 24.7
Write 17.8
Mixed 18
25% 20.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.34
4K Write 0.81
4K Mixed 0.65
58% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 36%
SanDisk Cruzer 8GB
2GB free, PID 5406
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
5.81% Terrible
Read 24.2
Write 5.62
Mixed 8
13% 12.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.43
4K Write 0.009
4K Mixed 0.01
17% 1.49 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.81%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
29.7% Poor
MC Read 12.1
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 11
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 7.5
19% 6.7 GB/s
Latency 76.2
52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0 Builds (Compare 1,717 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $134
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback