Asus P8Z77-M PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics26.3% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151215
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateFeb 27 '18 at 23:20
Run Duration221 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-3770-$266
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
75.7% Very good
SC Int 112
SC Float 115
SC Mixed 111
90% 113 Pts
QC Int 371
QC Float 378
QC Mixed 366
84% 372 Pts
MC Int 547
MC Float 552
MC Mixed 537
82% 545 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Asus(1043 8423) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
26.3% Poor
Lighting 68.9
Reflection 56.5
Parallax 90.3
24% 71.9 fps
MRender 63.4
Gravity 79.9
Splatting 51.8
28% 65 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 31%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
Read 467
Write 288
Mixed 373
83% 376 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 50.5
172% 71.9 MB/s
DQ Read 94.2
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 65.9
65% 101 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 96%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$120
3TB free
Firmware: SC60 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 177
Write 89.8
Mixed 85
87% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 1.49
4K Mixed 0.18
73% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 107%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$120
3TB free
Firmware: SC60 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 83.8
Write 87.2
Mixed 94.9
67% 88.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.34
4K Mixed 0.23
72% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 107%
Seagate ST3000DM003-1F216N 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC52 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Read 148
Write 139
Mixed 127
104% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.17
67% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 95%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$120
651GB free
Firmware: SC60 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Read 145
Write 129
Mixed 124
100% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.65
4K Mixed 0.2
73% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 107%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$124
292GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 93.2
Write 96
Mixed 92.7
71% 93.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.36
4K Write 1.97
4K Mixed 0.18
72% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
48.1% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 15.3
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 12.6
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 63%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical P8Z77-M PRO Builds (Compare 1,596 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-M PRO - $360

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,126
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $344Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $145Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $260Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $114
Intel Core i5-8600K $245AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $134
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $150SanDisk Extreme 64GB $80
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $899SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $160SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $11
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback