Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium B970 2,956 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	36.7% Below average	Memory 58.7 1-Core 21.5 2-Core 33.3 28% 37.8 Pts	4-Core 90.9 8-Core 73 11% 81.9 Pts	64-Core 71 4% 71 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz) 45,735 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 0506) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	0.91% Terrible	Lighting 0.93 Reflection 0.88 Parallax 0.94 1% 0.92 fps	MRender 1.62 Gravity 0.77 Splatting 1.83 1% 1.4 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.91% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 209GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0CB6Q Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	60.5% Good	Read 423 Write 336 Mixed 352 82% 370 MB/s	4K Read 22.3 4K Write 35.5 4K Mixed 15.4 72% 24.4 MB/s	DQ Read 31.6 DQ Write 32.8 DQ Mixed 14.9 16% 26.4 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 118%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown NT4GC64B8HG0NS-CG Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 8GB 112 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	37% Below average	MC Read 14.5 MC Write 14.3 MC Mixed 12.9 40% 13.9 GB/s	SC Read 8.2 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 7.1 20% 7.13 GB/s	Latency 131 30% 131 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	131x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	48x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	15x

RAM
ACR256X64D3S13C9G 2x2GBKingstonBench 38%, 1,037 samples	10x
ACR256X64D3S13C9G 1x2GBKingstonBench 21%, 403 samples	8x
M471B5273CH0-CH9 M471B5273DH0-CH9 8GBSamsungBench 43%, 1,624 samples	7x

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $253

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16