ADD TO PC
BUILD

User System

Performance Results


Gaming 76% Battleship	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 66% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	85.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	49.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Thirdwave Diginnos PC
Motherboard	ASRock H170 Pro4S
Memory	12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160913
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Mar 07 '18 at 23:23
Run Duration	217 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180 588,978 User benchmarks, average bench 81% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	87.4% Excellent	Memory 93.3 1-Core 128 2-Core 255 89% 159 Pts	4-Core 439 8-Core 692 70% 565 Pts	64-Core 695 43% 695 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 87.4% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% MSI(1462 3302) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.31 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	85.3% Excellent	Lighting 106 Reflection 115 Parallax 98.8 86% 107 fps	MRender 98.2 Gravity 102 Splatting 103 83% 101 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 85.3% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100 67,541 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 119GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0CR021 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 7786 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1807 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 85 85 227 (AE) Unknown 100 100 83 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 54 197569151012 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 85 85 15 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 66220695788 (F7) Unknown 100 100 2073552063 (F8) Unknown 100 100 817473179 (B4) Unknown 0 0 1266 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0	49.1% Average	Read 477 Write 95 Mixed 154 52% 242 MB/s	4K Read 15.8 4K Write 59.7 4K Mixed 9.76 68% 28.4 MB/s	DQ Read 117 DQ Write 89.1 DQ Mixed 12.8 34% 72.9 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 95%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 317GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 142 142 68 (03) Spinup time 128 128 12896633012 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 6711 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 108 108 37 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 7953 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1807 (C0) Power-off retract count 94 94 8351 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 94 94 8351 (C2) HDA temperature 176 176 180389347362 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	80.7% Excellent	Read 142 Write 140 Mixed 129 103% 137 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 1.83 4K Mixed 0.18 82% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 80.7% Great: 107%
I-O DATA HDCL-UT 3TB 148 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 460GB free, PID 014a Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	68.5% Good	Read 180 Write 174 Mixed 122 198% 159 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.41 4K Mixed 0.17 56% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 66%
Maxtor 4R120L0 123GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 21GB free, PID 0104 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	17.9% Very poor	Read 35.9 Write 36.1 Mixed 12.7 34% 28.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.24 4K Write 1.54 4K Mixed 0.32 64% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 17.9% Great: 18%
I-O DATA HDCR-U 1TB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 6GB free, PID 012e Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	18.1% Very poor	Read 38.2 Write 40.3 Mixed 37.5 50% 38.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.39 4K Write 1.19 4K Mixed 0.26 51% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 18.1% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB 2x8GB 6,881 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	70.8% Very good	MC Read 27.1 MC Write 26.8 MC Mixed 20.1 70% 24.7 GB/s	SC Read 16.9 SC Write 25.1 SC Mixed 23.2 62% 21.7 GB/s	Latency 61.4 65% 61.4 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 70.8% Great: 76%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback