| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 9.32% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus M5A97 PLUS (all builds) |
| Memory | 3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20150423 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 10 '18 at 01:26 |
| Run Duration | 91 Seconds |
| Run User | COL-User |
| Background CPU | 44% |
PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
55.6%
Above average
|
53% 86.1 Pts
|
30% 239 Pts
|
17% 281 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GT 740
EVGA(3842 3747) 2GB
CLim: 1084 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.65
|
9.32%
Terrible
|
9% 10.7 fps
|
11% 13.1 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
240GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
47.9%
Average
|
46% 63.4 MB/s
|
127% 0.97 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C10D3/8G 8GB
1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
38.3%
Below average
|
39% 13.7 GB/s
|
25% 8.73 GB/s
|
44% 90.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A97 PLUS Builds (Compare 124 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A97 PLUS
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 25x |
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 23x |
| FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 16x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 16x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 14x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 7x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 77% - Very good | Total price: $252 |