Asrock X370 Pro4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	65.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X370 Pro4 (all builds)
Memory	4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180124
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 17 '18 at 20:14
Run Duration	92 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	68%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104 181,631 User benchmarks, average bench 60% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	67.8% Good	Memory 72 1-Core 64.9 2-Core 184 60% 107 Pts	4-Core 359 8-Core 415 50% 387 Pts	64-Core 415 26% 415 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 67.8% Great: 72%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
TEAML5Lite3D120G 120GB 2,389 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 95GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0607A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 16 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 115 (A3) Unknown 100 100 9 (A4) Unknown 100 100 275 (A5) Unknown 100 100 3 (A6) Unknown 100 100 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 1000 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 3 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 636 (F2) Unknown 100 100 370 (F5) Unknown 100 100 550	65.6% Good	Read 371 Write 354 Mixed 364 81% 363 MB/s	4K Read 26.7 4K Write 54.3 4K Mixed 17.8 92% 32.9 MB/s	DQ Read 29 DQ Write 60.3 DQ Mixed 21 23% 36.7 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 65.6% Great: 110%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 3,454 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 879GB free, PID a00d Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	42.3% Average	Read 105 Write 99.2 Mixed 90.5 125% 98.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.35 4K Write 1.73 4K Mixed 0.19 67% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 2x4GB 7,555 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	73.9% Very good	MC Read 28 MC Write 27.7 MC Mixed 26.5 78% 27.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 29.1 SC Mixed 13.2 54% 19 GB/s	Latency 96.9 41% 96.9 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 73.9% Great: 105%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 Pro4 Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 44%

Speed boat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 40%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Pro4

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	45x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $85Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	26x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	23x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	23x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	13x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	13x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x
MX500 250GBCrucial $40Bench 101%, 77,177 samples	6x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	6x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $39Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	9x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	7x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $38Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $322

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16