| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 20.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 61.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20130916 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 19 '18 at 18:56 |
| Run Duration | 176 Seconds |
| Run User | HUN-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
69.8%
Good
|
62% 101 Pts
|
45% 361 Pts
|
27% 440 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD HD 7850-$174
Sapphire(174B E221) 2GB
CLim: 860 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.12.1
|
20.4%
Poor
|
20% 26.9 fps
|
21% 24.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
61.9%
Good
|
66% 295 MB/s
|
78% 25.2 MB/s
|
56% 96.4 MB/s
|
|
|
81.3%
Excellent
|
98% 131 MB/s
|
138% 1.35 MB/s
| |
|
|
17.8%
Very poor
|
33% 37.8 MB/s
|
36% 3.06 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
48.4%
Average
|
50% 17.4 GB/s
|
30% 10.6 GB/s
|
57% 70.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A97 EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 581 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 - $166
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 227x |
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 102x |
| FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 95x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 41x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 30x |
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 27x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 70% - Very good | Total price: $512 |