Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics29.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive202% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171031
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 20 '18 at 20:53
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$198
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
Memory 95
1-Core 136
2-Core 268
93% 166 Pts
4-Core 534
8-Core 854
85% 694 Pts
64-Core 1,133
70% 1,133 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.24
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.2% Poor
Lighting 33
Reflection 38
Parallax 30.8
27% 33.9 fps
MRender 47.1
Gravity 33
Splatting 43
34% 41 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
202% Outstanding
Read 1,996
Write 1,104
Mixed 1,134
311% 1,411 MB/s
4K Read 53.8
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 24.7
176% 65.8 MB/s
DQ Read 56.7
DQ Write 133
DQ Mixed 26.4
40% 72.1 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 202%
Great: 236%
Crucial BX100 250GB-$141
97GB free
Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Read 521
Write 368
Mixed 430
98% 440 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 95.5
4K Mixed 37.4
136% 52.6 MB/s
DQ Read 30.3
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 63.7
81% 135 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 103%
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
47GB free
Firmware: DXT0AB0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
67.5% Good
Read 499
Write 134
Mixed 104
53% 246 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 9.78
104% 45.9 MB/s
DQ Read 325
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 28.3
73% 160 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 73%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$170
1TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
63.1% Good
Read 108
Write 111
Mixed 95.3
79% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.19
4K Mixed 0.23
99% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 63%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
707GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 189
Write 168
Mixed 155
128% 171 MB/s
4K Read 1.27
4K Write 2.26
4K Mixed 0.25
122% 1.26 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 103%
Great: 108%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61
550GB free
Firmware: MX4OACF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Read 124
Write 125
Mixed 117
92% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.09
4K Write 1.85
4K Mixed 0.19
101% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$75
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
81.8% Excellent
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 31
MC Mixed 22.8
82% 28.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 33
SC Mixed 24.6
72% 25.1 GB/s
Latency 57.2
70% 57.2 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 3,014 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $856
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback