Asus H97M-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 60% Destroyer	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 46% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	88.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	72.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus H97M-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	4.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141009
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 21 '18 at 10:55
Run Duration	233 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	16%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4460-$194 245,403 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	67.9% Good	Memory 80.7 1-Core 93.8 2-Core 182 69% 119 Pts	4-Core 316 8-Core 341 43% 328 Pts	64-Core 326 20% 326 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 67.9% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 8599) CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.1 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	88.6% Excellent	Lighting 112 Reflection 118 Parallax 100 92% 110 fps	MRender 98.3 Gravity 100 Splatting 104 83% 101 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 88.6% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 650 120GB 85GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 140 138 3966 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9117 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 78 78 16197 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3758 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 254 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 8862 (C2) HDA temperature 113 94 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	9.97% Terrible	Read 99.3 Write 88.6 Mixed 73.8 19% 87.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 1.66 4K Mixed 0.29 2% 0.82 MB/s

Samsung 650 120GB 2,684 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 65GB free Firmware: FXT01B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2185 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 637 (B1) Unknown 99 99 4 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 57 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 5 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1230510600	83.3% Excellent	Read 502 Write 430 Mixed 472 104% 468 MB/s	4K Read 28.1 4K Write 84 4K Mixed 22.5 116% 44.8 MB/s	DQ Read 33 DQ Write 85 DQ Mixed 48.2 40% 55.4 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 83.3% Great: 84%
Samsung 650 120GB 2,684 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 27GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXT01B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 6265 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1543 (B1) Unknown 95 95 98 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 53 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 64 (EB) Unknown 99 99 51 (F1) Unknown 99 99 24550054391	72.9% Very good	Read 502 Write 423 Mixed 405 99% 443 MB/s	4K Read 25.7 4K Write 48 4K Mixed 17 86% 30.2 MB/s	DQ Read 31.8 DQ Write 31.3 DQ Mixed 17 17% 26.7 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 84%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23 63,281 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 255GB free Firmware: 17.01H17 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 140 138 3958 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 831 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 2627 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 388 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 63 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1888 (C2) HDA temperature 115 96 28 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	59.1% Above average	Read 103 Write 103 Mixed 98.1 76% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 1.66 4K Mixed 0.32 92% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 59.1% Great: 54%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB 6,502 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 146GB free Firmware: 1306 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	52.9% Above average	Read 90 Write 94.3 Mixed 71.1 64% 85.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.29 4K Write 1.31 4K Mixed 0.21 60% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 59%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 84GB free Firmware: 05.04C05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 1 (03) Spinup time 138 136 6091 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 8182 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 66 66 25079 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5655 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 166 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 8167 (C2) HDA temperature 116 99 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 167246 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	42% Average	Read 74.3 Write 72.1 Mixed 79.7 57% 75.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.12 4K Write 0.64 4K Mixed 0.2 39% 0.32 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G 1337 FLFF65F-C8KL9 KHX1600C10D3/8G 12GB 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	37.4% Below average	MC Read 12.5 MC Write 13.4 MC Mixed 11.8 36% 12.6 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 11.9 SC Mixed 11.7 32% 11.2 GB/s	Latency 79.2 50% 79.2 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H97M-PLUS Builds (Compare 972 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H97M-PLUS - $140

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	249x
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	120x
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	108x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	92x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	73x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	62x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	43x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	31x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	27x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	44x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	22x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $390

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16