| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 25.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 43.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
| Motherboard | DFI LP JR X58 (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1 GHz |
| Display | 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20100908 |
| Uptime | 6.1 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 22 '18 at 05:02 |
| Run Duration | 90 Seconds |
| Run User | TWN-User |
| Background CPU | 51% |
PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
61.6%
Good
|
58% 94.1 Pts
|
35% 285 Pts
|
23% 371 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD HD 7950-$290
Device(0000 0000) 3GB
CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.3.2
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.8%
Poor
|
27% 33.1 fps
|
24% 28.9 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
43.6%
Average
|
39% 174 MB/s
|
79% 30.4 MB/s
|
20% 39.8 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 6 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR2
|
32.4%
Below average
|
32% 11.1 GB/s
|
21% 7.27 GB/s
|
53% 75.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical LP JR X58 Builds (Compare 3 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: DFI LP JR X58
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7 980Intel $148Bench 75%, 2,215 samples | 1x |
| Core i7 X 980Intel $148Bench 76%, 8,133 samples | 1x |
| Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples | 1x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 670Nvidia $435Bench 28%, 47,610 samples | 1x |
| HD 5870AMDBench 19%, 10,176 samples | 1x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 31% - Below average | Total price: $662 |