ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP EliteBook 725 G2

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	64.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP EliteBook 725 G2 (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 221D
Memory	5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170713
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 22 '18 at 16:41
Run Duration	100 Seconds
Run User	VNM-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8 PRO-7150B R5, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6G 923 User benchmarks, average bench 30% Socket FS1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	36.2% Below average	Memory 55.8 1-Core 39.5 2-Core 72.3 36% 55.9 Pts	4-Core 98.5 8-Core 99.2 13% 98.8 Pts	64-Core 90.1 6% 90.1 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 36.2% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics 629 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 221D) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.7 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	2.77% Terrible	Lighting 3.27 Reflection 3.58 Parallax 3.81 3% 3.55 fps	MRender 3.86 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 4.43 3% 3.53 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.77% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Plextor M6V 256GB-$110 435 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 178GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1945 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 802 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 26 (AE) Unknown 100 100 36 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 26 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 140 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 7 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 169002 (F1) Unknown 100 100 146182 (F2) Unknown 100 100 93937	64.7% Good	Read 487 Write 335 Mixed 403 91% 408 MB/s	4K Read 16.4 4K Write 27.5 4K Mixed 22.2 68% 22.1 MB/s	DQ Read 87.3 DQ Write 59 DQ Mixed 38.6 38% 61.7 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 106%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G6N1 2x4GB 2,766 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	27.8% Poor	MC Read 12.5 MC Write 6.4 MC Mixed 11.4 29% 10.1 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 8 17% 6.1 GB/s	Latency 141 28% 141 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical EliteBook 725 G2 Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 32%

Sail boat

Workstation

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 725 G2

CPU
A8 PRO-7150B R5, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6GAMDBench 30%, 923 samples	15x
A10 PRO-7350B R6, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6GAMDBench 32%, 976 samples	5x

GPU
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 629 samples	13x
Radeon R6 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 634 samples	4x
Radeon R6 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 5,093 samples	2x

SSD
LCH-256V2S-HP 256GBLiteonBench 75%, 1,560 samples	4x
SATA SSD 480GBKioxia-exceriaBench 78%, 7,893 samples	2x
MZ7TE128HMGR-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 58%, 2,337 samples	2x

RAM
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 44,908 samples	2x
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 40,451 samples	2x
16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 1x8GBMicronBench 27%, 14,954 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $33	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback