Asus Crosshair IV Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.23% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive37.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Crosshair IV Formula  (all builds)
Memory8.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100322
Uptime8.5 Days
Run DateMar 22 '18 at 20:40
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Memory 82.4
1-Core 46
2-Core 98.9
49% 75.8 Pts
4-Core 186
8-Core 198
26% 192 Pts
64-Core 196
12% 196 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5570
Gigabyte(1458 21E0) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
5.23% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 7.58
Parallax 5.5
6% 6.59 fps
MRender 6.43
Gravity 4.47
Splatting 6.48
5% 5.79 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.23%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD 64GB-$56
48GB free
Firmware: 2.0.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
37.8% Below average
Read 346
Write 191
Mixed 199
54% 246 MB/s
4K Read 16.5
4K Write 13.7
4K Mixed 6.32
40% 12.2 MB/s
DQ Read 14.7
DQ Write 13.4
DQ Mixed 6.51
7% 11.5 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 48%
Toshiba OCZ TL100 240GB-$56
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFZ10.1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
37.8% Below average
Read 302
Write 115
Mixed 106
38% 175 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 31.3
4K Mixed 6.24
62% 20.8 MB/s
DQ Read 27.3
DQ Write 28.6
DQ Mixed 9.17
12% 21.7 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 89%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
582GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
28.4% Poor
Read 50.3
Write 48.5
Mixed 49.3
37% 49.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 0.81
4K Mixed 0.14
55% 0.51 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 59%
WD WD6400AACS-00G8B1 640GB
222GB free
Firmware: 05.04C05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
40.9% Average
Read 72.2
Write 69.8
Mixed 44.7
46% 62.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.31
101% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown OCZ3BE1600LV2G OCZ3BE1600LV2G CT102464BD160B.M16 12GB
533, 533, 533 MHz
2048, 2048, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
22.8% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 7
20% 7.1 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 6.1
17% 6.07 GB/s
Latency 76.2
52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Crosshair IV Formula Builds (Compare 280 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $520
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback