Asus CG8270

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	18.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus CG8270 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK CG8270
Memory	8.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121225
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 25 '18 at 15:21
Run Duration	167 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	35%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	73.3% Very good	Memory 91.5 1-Core 102 2-Core 201 76% 132 Pts	4-Core 298 8-Core 472 47% 385 Pts	64-Core 507 31% 507 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Zotac(19DA 288A) 2GB CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	18.3% Very poor	Lighting 23 Reflection 17.3 Parallax 20.6 19% 20.3 fps	MRender 25.6 Gravity 23.4 Splatting 17.1 18% 22 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 150 960GB-$190 3,375 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 433GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFZ12.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 5970 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2061 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 2 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 188 188 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 22 (C2) HDA temperature 66 50 214749544482 (F1) Unknown 100 100 301672	56.1% Above average	Read 399 Write 282 Mixed 277 71% 319 MB/s	4K Read 25.5 4K Write 43.5 4K Mixed 9.06 73% 26 MB/s	DQ Read 28.3 DQ Write 65 DQ Mixed 10 18% 34.4 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 56.1% Great: 103%
Crucial M500 480GB-$84 9,168 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 115GB free Firmware: MU05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 1 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 7279 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 4507 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 99 99 53 (AE) Unknown 100 100 143 (B4) Unknown 0 0 8219 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 66 58 180388626466 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 99 99 1 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 26114626749 (F7) Unknown 100 100 844448394 (F8) Unknown 100 100 739822068	47.6% Average	Read 198 Write 226 Mixed 171 44% 198 MB/s	4K Read 21.7 4K Write 57.5 4K Mixed 14.5 82% 31.2 MB/s	DQ Read 21.9 DQ Write 61.1 DQ Mixed 16.8 20% 33.2 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$32 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 647GB free Firmware: CC4C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 99 174216536 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9563 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 69 60 12911162641 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 11181 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5707 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 60 504758302 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 365 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 74 74 53072 (C2) HDA temperature 30 40 55834574878 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -54327041324274 (F1) Unknown 100 253 802870804146 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1166823892548	80% Excellent	Read 151 Write 128 Mixed 89.9 91% 123 MB/s	4K Read 1.04 4K Write 1.28 4K Mixed 0.34 105% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 80% Great: 112%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82 64,359 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 523GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 182 178 5891 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3105 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 5840 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1395 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 56 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 3048 (C2) HDA temperature 121 108 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	62.8% Good	Read 121 Write 98 Mixed 76.3 73% 98.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.16 76% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 62.8% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata EL64C1C1624Z1 3x4GB 87 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 3 of 4 slots used 12GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	31.9% Below average	MC Read 11.2 MC Write 9.9 MC Mixed 9 29% 10 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 10.3 SC Mixed 9.5 28% 9.73 GB/s	Latency 64.9 62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CG8270 Builds (Compare 292 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

System: Asus CG8270

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	227x
Core i5-3350PIntel $60Bench 65%, 21,413 samples	18x
Core i5-3450Intel $59Bench 66%, 34,199 samples	10x

GPU
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	36x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	29x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	16x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	14x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	13x
MZ7TE128HMGR-000L1 128GBSamsungBench 62%, 5,980 samples	11x

RAM
SLA302G08-GGNHC 2x4GBUnknownBench 54%, 1,334 samples	13x
SLA302G08-GGNHC 4x4GBUnknownBench 56%, 881 samples	12x
EL64C1C1624Z1 2x4GBAdataBench 55%, 601 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 46% - Average

Total price: $567

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16