MSI X370 GAMING PRO (MS-7A33)

Performance Results


Gaming 46% Yacht	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 46% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	47.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	210% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	MSI MS-7A33
Motherboard	MSI X370 GAMING PRO (MS-7A33) (all builds)
Memory	13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180128
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 26 '18 at 02:05
Run Duration	214 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$225 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	79.2% Very good	Memory 78.1 1-Core 114 2-Core 228 78% 140 Pts	4-Core 430 8-Core 861 76% 646 Pts	64-Core 1,194 74% 1,194 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 79.2% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% MSI(1462 3416) CLim: 1281 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.2.1 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	47.4% Average	Lighting 59.8 Reflection 63.9 Parallax 70.8 49% 64.8 fps	MRender 61.8 Gravity 50.8 Splatting 53.1 45% 55.2 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 453GB free Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 326 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 43 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 67 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 1 (F1) Unknown 99 99 66454471	105% Outstanding	Read 520 Write 419 Mixed 422 101% 454 MB/s	4K Read 41.9 4K Write 74.8 4K Mixed 44.8 161% 53.9 MB/s	DQ Read 263 DQ Write 158 DQ Mixed 93.6 101% 172 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 134%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 162GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	210% Outstanding	Read 2,060 Write 1,114 Mixed 1,153 318% 1,442 MB/s	4K Read 49.7 4K Write 81 4K Mixed 38.6 168% 56.4 MB/s	DQ Read 298 DQ Write 135 DQ Mixed 95.1 103% 176 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 210% Great: 236%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 158GB free Firmware: EXT0BB0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 58104 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 179 (B1) Unknown 95 95 57 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 44 28 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 44 (F1) Unknown 99 99 9966474417	87.4% Excellent	Read 507 Write 349 Mixed 353 89% 403 MB/s	4K Read 41.1 4K Write 57.7 4K Mixed 25.3 125% 41.4 MB/s	DQ Read 254 DQ Write 134 DQ Mixed 71.4 86% 153 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 87.4% Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 1TB free Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 112 100 49302400 (03) Spinup time 99 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 326 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 237341 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 366 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 63 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 70 471007259 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 6 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1318 (C2) HDA temperature 27 40 64424509467 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -85465554223017 (F1) Unknown 100 253 1664920430 (F2) Unknown 100 253 239743982	90% Excellent	Read 158 Write 156 Mixed 156 118% 157 MB/s	4K Read 0.73 4K Write 1.81 4K Mixed 0.24 91% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 90% Great: 114%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$56 127,507 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 827GB free Firmware: SDM1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 76 65 36935086 (03) Spinup time 99 99 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 472 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 960370 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 92466350915882 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 62 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 78 72 420610070 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 3 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 635 (C2) HDA temperature 22 40 22 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 2710124364010 (F1) Unknown 100 253 326902889 (F2) Unknown 100 253 198313692 (FE) Unknown 100 100 0	52.3% Above average	Read 103 Write 79.8 Mixed 75.6 64% 86 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 1.35 4K Mixed 0.75 132% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 52.3% Great: 70%
Seagate Expansion 1TB 60,540 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 380GB free Firmware: 0637 Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	45.4% Average	Read 80 Write 78.1 Mixed 78.2 59% 78.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.55 4K Write 1.82 4K Mixed 0.26 85% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 66%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2666 C15 2x8GB 19,779 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	97.2% Outstanding	MC Read 37.7 MC Write 34.6 MC Mixed 33.2 100% 35.2 GB/s	SC Read 24.3 SC Write 36.4 SC Mixed 29.8 86% 30.2 GB/s	Latency 84.2 48% 84.2 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 97.2% Great: 96%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 GAMING PRO (MS-7A33) Builds (Compare 277 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 75%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: MSI X370 GAMING PRO (MS-7A33)

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	39x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	31x
Ryzen 5 1600XAMD $125Bench 74%, 140,440 samples	30x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	26x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	20x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	19x

SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	9x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	8x
MX500 500GBCrucial $55Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	8x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	17x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	14x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $683

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

MSI X370 GAMING PRO (MS-7A33)

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: MSI X370 GAMING PRO (MS-7A33)

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)