| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 12.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asus P8P67 PRO REV 3.1 (all builds) |
| Memory | 28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20121101 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 26 '18 at 22:02 |
| Run Duration | 222 Seconds |
| Run User | FRA-User |
| Background CPU | 28% |
PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
|
49.8%
Average
|
44% 65.1 Pts
|
20% 166 Pts
|
13% 204 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 460-$203
Nvidia(10DE 0804) 768MB
CLim: 675 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 768MB, Driver: 388.13
|
12.2%
Very poor
|
12% 14.6 fps
|
13% 16.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba DT01ABA300 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: MZ6O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
77.2%
Very good
|
104% 137 MB/s
|
79% 0.86 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC24 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
90.5%
Outstanding
|
120% 159 MB/s
|
69% 0.62 MB/s
| |
|
|
7.73%
Terrible
|
17% 17 MB/s
|
28% 1.6 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Transcend JM1600KLH-16GK 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
|
50.1%
Above average
|
54% 18.7 GB/s
|
27% 9.5 GB/s
|
45% 88.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P8P67 PRO REV 3.1 Builds (Compare 458 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P8P67 PRO REV 3.1
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 160x |
| Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 152x |
| Core i7-2600Intel $194Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 43x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 40x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 36x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 29x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $516 |