ADD TO PC
BUILD

Eurocom P170HM Neptune

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	8.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	72.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Eurocom P170HM Neptune (all builds)
Motherboard	EUROCOM P170HM Neptune
Memory	1.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit barev, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20101224
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 27 '18 at 19:08
Run Duration	198 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2820QM-$230 4,929 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 23,970,356 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	68.2% Good	Memory 83.2 1-Core 82.5 2-Core 163 65% 110 Pts	4-Core 288 8-Core 415 44% 352 Pts	64-Core 414 26% 414 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 470M 38 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Clevo(1558 7100) 1.5GB CLim: 535 MHz, MLim: 750 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	8.7% Terrible	Lighting 10.4 Reflection 12 Parallax 8.69 8% 10.4 fps	MRender 13.8 Gravity 10 Splatting 10.3 9% 11.4 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.7% Great: 10%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$25 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 12GB free (System drive) Firmware: U21010RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 81 100 1361 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 984 (A6) Unknown 100 100 3223 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 3275 (A9) Unknown 100 100 31 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 3242 (AE) Unknown 100 100 65 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 56 100 279172874284 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 1 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 108 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 662263 (F1) Unknown 253 253 17441 (F2) Unknown 253 253 9215	72.1% Very good	Read 466 Write 426 Mixed 460 101% 451 MB/s	4K Read 16.9 4K Write 70.2 4K Mixed 5.13 69% 30.7 MB/s	DQ Read 201 DQ Write 169 DQ Mixed 33 66% 135 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 86%
Seagate Expansion 1TB 60,540 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 101GB free Firmware: 0707 Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	17.9% Very poor	Read 31.8 Write 29.3 Mixed 23.7 21% 28.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.75 4K Write 3.38 4K Mixed 0.23 120% 1.46 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 17.9% Great: 66%
Seagate Momentus XT 7200 RPM 2.5" 750GB-$55 8,365 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 10GB free Firmware: SM12 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 140057968 (03) Spinup time 98 98 0 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9887 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 75 60 29888504 (09) Power-on hours count 86 86 12267 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2870 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 253 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 50 4967432230 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 965 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 1 1 582272 (C2) HDA temperature 38 50 -140737488355290 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 38 33 140057968 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (FE) Unknown 100 100 0	38.7% Below average	Read 64.6 Write 70.2 Mixed 63.2 50% 66 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.16 62% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 63%
Seagate ST9320423AS 320GB-$40 13,598 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 2GB free Firmware: 0002SDM1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 148180655 (03) Spinup time 98 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 88 88 13059 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 70 60 21530125850 (09) Power-on hours count 80 80 17569 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4170 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 98 2 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 49 655622183 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 70 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 1 1 764513 (C2) HDA temperature 39 51 47244640295 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 56 51 148180655 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -3427383897157 (F1) Unknown 100 253 3550983341 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1733981463 (FE) Unknown 100 100 0	25.4% Poor	Read 43.9 Write 44.4 Mixed 43.9 33% 44 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 0.92 4K Mixed 0.38 77% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 25.4% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair SODIM DDR3 1333 C9 4x4GB 77 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	48% Average	MC Read 16.9 MC Write 17 MC Mixed 15.2 47% 16.4 GB/s	SC Read 14 SC Write 15.4 SC Mixed 15.7 43% 15 GB/s	Latency 74.9 53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback